Amanda-Users

Re: Question using amflush

2004-12-08 09:31:08
Subject: Re: Question using amflush
From: "James Marcinek" <jmarc1 AT jemconsult DOT biz>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:10:37 -0000
That's what I did to make me believe something was a miss and post to the list.

Thanks,

James

Christoph Scheeder &lt;christoph.scheeder AT scheeder DOT de&gt; wrote: 
> Hi,
> there is a verry easy way to tell what amflush is doing:
> 
> amstatus <configname>
> 
> it shows you which dump is actualy getting flushed, which are waiting to 
> be flushed, which are already flushed and lots of other info's.
> Christoph
> 
> James Marcinek schrieb:
> > I initially just straced the parent process (22802 amflush normal) which
didn't
> > output anything:
> > 
> > Here's the ps -ef again with the trace commands for each PID involved:
> > 
> > ps -ef |grep amanda
> > amanda   22803 22802  0 14:01 ?        00:00:00 driver normal nodump
> > amanda   22804 22803  0 14:01 ?        00:00:00 taper normal
> > amanda   22805 22804  0 14:01 ?        00:00:00 taper normal
> > root     27581 27541  0 17:29 pts/0    00:00:00 su - amanda
> > amanda   27582 27581  0 17:29 pts/0    00:00:00 -bash
> > amanda   22802     1 98 14:01 ?        05:04:39 amflush normal
> > amanda   27972 27582  0 19:10 pts/0    00:00:00 ps -ef
> > amanda   27973 27582  0 19:10 pts/0    00:00:00 grep amanda
> > -bash-2.05b$ strace -p 22803
> > read(0, 
> > 
> > strace -p 22804
> > read(0, 
> > 
> > -bash-2.05b$ strace -p 22805
> > read(3, 
> > 
> > -bash-2.05b$ strace -p 22802
> >  
> > No output for this...
> > 
> > I'm not sure what to expect for my results to be honest. If this isn't
normal
> > then I guess I should kill it. Then I need to know what the Root Cause is so
I
> > can fix it.
> > 
> > On another matter, could of I just deleted these directories if I didn't
want to
> > flush them or would that cause problems?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > James
> > 
> > Paul Bijnens &lt;paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com&gt; wrote: 
> > 
> >>James Marcinek wrote:
> >>
> >>>I've recently deployed amanda. The client forgot tapes on several occasions
> > 
> > and
> > 
> >>>I've got 4 backups in my holding area. I initiated the amflush command and
> >>>followed the instructions. The job kicked off in the background and I've
> > 
> > been
> > 
> >>>using:
> >>>
> >>>ps -ef |grep amanda
> >>>
> >>>to see if the process is still running, which it is. When I do a top
command
> >>>it's using lots of CPU time.
> >>
> >>Which process is taking CPU time?  planner? driver? taper?
> >>
> >>
> >>>It's been runninng for several hours now and my logs haven't been
populating
> >>>since it started. Here's the last few entries:
> >>>
> >>>START amflush date 20041207
> >>>START driver date 20041207
> >>>START taper datestamp 20041207 label Normal18 tape 0
> >>>
> >>>I'm a bit confused because I now see a folder 20041207 in my /var/holding.
> > 
> > It's
> > 
> >>>empty, which is good if it's working properly.
> >>
> >>For flush, that's normal.
> >>
> >>
> >>>Why isn't anything being populated too(amflush and log file)? Is there any
> > 
> > way
> > 
> >>>to tell if it's running properly?
> >>
> >>On linux:    strace -p The-PID
> >>on Solaris:  truss -p The-PID
> >>
> >>"lsof -o the-PID" tells you which files are opened, and sometimes can
> >>give a hint what it is doing (e.g. which file it is reading/writing).
> >>
> >>(hit Ctrl-C to stop it).
> >>
> >>PS. have also a look at "autoflush on": when forgetting a tape once,
> >>     the next time, amanda flushes automatically.
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 
> 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>