Amanda-Users

Re: amtapetype error - Estimate phase 2

2004-11-16 17:35:14
Subject: Re: amtapetype error - Estimate phase 2
From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
To: Keith Howanitz <howanitz AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:30:40 -0500
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 11:01, Keith Howanitz wrote:
>On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:46:38 -0500, Gene Heskett
>
><gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net> wrote:
>> The only thing that comes to mind quickly is to see if ammt can
>> cause that tape to rewind itself, the clue is similar to its not
>> being rewound between passes.
>
>[SNIP]
>
>I have tried using ammt instead of mt with a tar backup and
> everything appeared to function just fine.  Text below
>
>[root]# ammt -d -f /dev/nst0 status
>debug mode!
>syntax: eof                  -> e
>syntax: weof                 -> w
>syntax: fsf                  -> f
>syntax: asf                  -> a
>syntax: bsf                  -> b
>syntax: rewind               -> rewi
>syntax: offline              -> o
>syntax: rewoffl              -> rewo
>syntax: status               -> s
>tapename is "/dev/nst0"
>calling tape_open("/dev/nst0",0)
>processing status(1)
>calling tapefd_status()
>/dev/nst0 status: ONLINE BOT
>
>[root]# ammt -d -f /dev/nst0 rewind
>debug mode!
>syntax: eof                  -> e
>syntax: weof                 -> w
>syntax: fsf                  -> f
>syntax: asf                  -> a
>syntax: bsf                  -> b
>syntax: rewind               -> rewi
>syntax: offline              -> o
>syntax: rewoffl              -> rewo
>syntax: status               -> s
>tapename is "/dev/nst0"
>calling tape_open("/dev/nst0",0)
>processing rewind(1)
>
>[root]# tar -cf /dev/nst0 /mhome/test/
>tar: Removing leading `/' from member names
>
>[root]# ammt -d -f /dev/nst0 rewind
>debug mode!
>syntax: eof                  -> e
>syntax: weof                 -> w
>syntax: fsf                  -> f
>syntax: asf                  -> a
>syntax: bsf                  -> b
>syntax: rewind               -> rewi
>syntax: offline              -> o
>syntax: rewoffl              -> rewo
>syntax: status               -> s
>tapename is "/dev/nst0"
>calling tape_open("/dev/nst0",0)
>processing rewind(1)

That looks ok to me.  And its my best shot ATM as I'm up to my butt in 
alligators here trying to make runtapes=2 work in the verify phase.
Sorry.  Jon?, Paul?  Do either of you have any better ideas?

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.29% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>