Re: Degraded mode with changer broken?
2004-04-13 15:34:50
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 03:10:17PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > So what am I doing wrong? Is degraded mode in conjunction with a changer
> > meant to work at all?
>
> I don't think degraded mode has anything to do with changer.
>
> Degraded mode is a much misused term.
>
> No tape DOES NOT mean degraded mode.
>
> You need the combination of no tape AND (note the important AND)
> the available holding disk space is too small to accept the
> level 0's the planner wants to do. Note in this case, "available"
> includes the reduction specified by the "reserve" parameter.
Ah, thanks for clarifying this. Seems like I had the "reserve" set too low.
But I still don't understand why the logfiles got moved to the oldlog
directory right after the amdump run.
--
-- Josef Wolf -- jw AT raven.inka DOT de --
|
|
|