On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:19:52AM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> Rohit wrote:
> >From: "Jon LaBadie" <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
> >
> >>I don't think your assumption is correct.  I think runspercycle 
> >>"ignores" the units part.  So it was thinking you had a total of 5
> >>runs per dumpcycle.
> >
> >
> >I read it somewhere it this mailing list that runspercycle does 
> >compute based on units specified. Also, amadmin balance command 
> >showed "estimated 35 runs per dumpcycle" in the last line when I had
> >runspercycle as 5 weeks. When I removed 'weeks' from that line --
> >then it showed correct value -- 5 runs per dumpcycle.
> 
> runspercycle does indeed take a unit if specified.
> 

Glad I said "I think" rather than "It doesn't!"
Thanks for correcting that.

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)