Re: taper algo change
2003-08-11 22:14:04
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:10:52PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >
> >If that is the case, why not use taper algo "largest"?
> >
>
> ... . Remember, the
> algorithm only takes into account dumps that are in the holding area at
> the time sendaflush() is called, namely when a taper becomes idle (I
> think), not all of the dumps as a whole (which is what I want).
You are correct of course, I was thinking it waited for all dumps
to complete. New algo's LARGEST_WAIT, LARGESTFIT_WAIT ... :)
--
Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
|
|
|