Re: Amanda and Mac OSX
2003-07-13 09:53:37
Thanks, that was the problem.
Roger Grant
Dietmar Goldbeck <dietmar.goldbeck AT acm DOT org>
Sent by: owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
07/13/2003 06:05 AM
|
To
| rgrant AT rgfm DOT com
|
cc
| amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
|
Subject
| Re: Amanda and Mac OSX |
|
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 01:50:37PM -0400, rgrant AT rgfm DOT com
wrote:
> Hi everyone, I recently got amanda compiled and running on Mac's running
> OS 10.2.6 (kernel 6.6). The backups are done using amanda 2.4.4 (on
Redhat
> Linux 7.2) with gnutar and all seems well on the level 0, but when
level
> 1's are done it seems that it always reverts to level 0's.
> I looked around and found the the files that seems to keep the incremental
> info are stored in the format
> /usr/local/var/amanda/gnutar-lists/slice_name_0 , but on the said
system
> it stays as /usr/local/var/amanda/gnutar-lists/slice_name_0.new .
I am not
> sure why it keeps the .new extension ?
>
This could happen if you are using a dumptype with the no-record option.
The no-record option is for testing another Amanda version/configuration
or archive backups and makes no sense if you want normal incrementals.
--
Alles Gute / best wishes
Dietmar Goldbeck E-Mail: dietmar.goldbeck AT acm DOT org
Reporter (to Mahatma Gandhi): Mr Gandhi, what do you think of Western
Civilization? Gandhi: I think it would be a good idea.
|
|
|