Amanda-Users

Re: 'not an Amanda tape' after FreeBSD upgrade

2003-03-28 14:25:55
Subject: Re: 'not an Amanda tape' after FreeBSD upgrade
From: "Toomas Aas" <toomas.aas AT raad.tartu DOT ee>
To: Scott Lambert <lambert AT lambertfam DOT org>, amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:51:29 +0200
> From:          Scott Lambert <lambert AT lambertfam DOT org>

> On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:15:52AM +0200, Toomas Aas wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > My Amanda server is running 2.4.3b4. Three days ago I upgraded the 
> > operating system from FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p6 to 4.7-RELEASE-p9. This is 
> > really just some security patches to sendmail, libc and openssl. Since 
> > the upgrade Amanda thinks that all the backup tapes that were written 
> > before the upgrade are "not Amanda tapes". 
> > 
> > After I re-label the tape, Amanda agrees to write the backup to it and 
> 
> Could the compression bit have been toggled in you tape drive?

This doesn't seem to be the case. I checked after loading the next tape 
today and the compression settings are what they've always been.

Also, (say hello to mr. Murphy) the problem doesn't seem to exist at 
all with todays tape. After loading it I checked the Amanda label with 
dd as recommended by Gerhard den Hollander in another message and it 
looked OK. Amcheck was also happy with the tape. Maybe it was just some 
weird random problem with a couple of tapes.
--
Toomas Aas | toomas.aas AT raad.tartu DOT ee | http://www.raad.tartu.ee/~toomas/
* War doesn't determine who's right. War determines who's left.