On Saturday 08 February 2003 13:20, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Saturday 08 February 2003 07:27, Christoph Scheeder wrote:

Sheesh, 2 days to echo this message back to me? Somethings not up to 
snuff here.

>[...]
>
>>From Jean-Louis:
>>> Do you have the same problem with 2.4.4b1?
>>
>>this is the main production-server of a customer of us, and i'm a
>> bit scared about installing "beta"-software on it, so i haven't
>> try'd this yet. If you consider it stable enough for
>> production-use i'll try it.
>>
>>Christoph
>
>Christoph; I've been building the 2.4.4b1 releases and using them
>here, usually within 12 hours of their release on Jean-Louis's
>site, with no known problems here, on a redhat8.0 box using a
>Seagate/Compaq 4 slot changer.  For me, thats 'production use'.
>
>IMO, amanda is a moving target, getting better all the time, and
> its currently at least as stable as any 2.4.2 release ever was. 
> But that, and a buck twenty five will get you a cuppa most
> places.
>
>Here if it breaks, it hasn't broken a paying client, just me, but
>the list will be notified asap too.  Would I put it on a clients
>machinery?  In a heartbeat...
>
>My $0.02, not adjusted for inflation. :)

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
99.23% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly