Amanda-Users

Re: Problem with initial install of amanda on SCO openserver

2003-01-02 11:36:49
Subject: Re: Problem with initial install of amanda on SCO openserver
From: Gene Heskett <gene_heskett AT iolinc DOT net>
To: Josh More <jmore AT remote-print DOT com>, amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:00:01 -0500
On Tuesday 31 December 2002 18:04, Josh More wrote:
>Thanks for the help, I more-or-less got things working.
>The problem was a combination of the etimeout value, and
>some oddities that occurred when I replaced MMDF with Sendmail.
>
>However, I now have a new problem.  The check seems to run fine:
>
>------------------start check------------------
>[root]/home/users> su amanda -c "/usr/local/sbin/amcheck Daily"
>Amanda Tape Server Host Check
>-----------------------------
>Holding disk /usr/local/amanda/dumps: 58975840 KB disk space
> available, that's plenty ERROR: cannot overwrite active tape
> DailySet101
>       (expecting a new tape)

This is a showstopper Josh.  Either you need to label more tapes for 
amanda's use or whatever as amanda thinks there is already a backup 
on that tape, and will refuse to overwrite it until "tapecycle" 
tapes have been used since the last time this tape was written to.

Amanda will not normally append to an existing backup because of the 
uncertainties of where on the tape it is unless it has total 
control of the drive in one contiguous run.

>NOTE: skipping tape-writable test
>Server check took 4.827 seconds
>
>Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
>--------------------------------
>Client check: 2 hosts checked in 1.696 seconds, 0 problems found
>
>(brought to you by Amanda 2.4.3)
>-------------------end check-------------------
>
>However, the actual run seems to have problems:
>
>
>-------------------start run-------------------
>These dumps were to tape DailySet101.
>*** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [[writing filemark: I/O error]].
>Some dumps may have been left in the holding disk.
>Run amflush to flush them to tape.
>The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape.
>
>FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
>  cclcsup    /home lev 0 FAILED [out of tape]
>  cclcsup    /home lev 0 FAILED [dump to tape failed]
>
>
>STATISTICS:
>                          Total       Full      Daily
>                        --------   --------   --------
>Estimate Time (hrs:min)    0:13
>Run Time (hrs:min)         0:45
>Dump Time (hrs:min)        0:00       0:00       0:00
>Output Size (meg)           1.3        0.0        1.3
>Original Size (meg)         1.3        0.0        1.3
>Avg Compressed Size (%)     --         --         --   
> (level:#disks ...) Filesystems Dumped            1          0    
>      1   (1:1) Avg Dump Rate (k/s)       371.9        --      
> 371.9
>
>Tape Time (hrs:min)        0:00       0:00       0:00
>Tape Size (meg)             1.4        0.0        1.4
>Tape Used (%)               0.0        0.0        0.0  
> (level:#disks ...) Filesystems Taped             1          0    
>      1   (1:1) Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)   146.6        --      
> 146.6
>
>
>NOTES:
>  planner: Last full dump of cclcsup:/home on tape  overwritten in
> 1 run. taper: tape DailySet101 kb 1408 fm 1 writing filemark: I/O
> error driver: dumper0 pid 2129 is messed up, ignoring it.
>  driver: dumper0 exited with signal 6
>
>
>DUMP SUMMARY:
>                                     DUMPER STATS            TAPER
> STATS HOSTNAME     DISK        L ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS 
> KB/s MMM:SS  KB/s --------------------------
> --------------------------------- ------------ cclcsup      /home
>       0 FAILED --------------------------------------- cvsserver 
>   /home       1    1370   1408   --    0:04 371.8   0:10 146.6
>
>(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.3)
>-------------------end run-------------------
>
>Now, I know that there is enough room on the tape for what I am
> backing up. (40G tape, /home on the cvs server = 188M, /home on
> the cclcsup server = 3.1G)
>
>Any suggestions?
>
>Also, what is the recommended solution for replacing a tape in a
> tape run? i.e. if the tape gets damaged?  Presumably you would
> need to get a new tape, label it the same as the old tape and
> just add it to the run, right?

One could, with a lot of hand editing, do that.  However amanda 
needs to know that the tape is fubar so amanda can remove the 
indices and such associated with that tape, see the manpages 
please.  Once that is done, then you can label a new one to replace 
it, but amanda will then use it when she asks for it, which may not 
be in the proper numerical order for humans to use.  Amanda doesn't 
care as long as the tape she is supposed to use is available when 
she needs it.

>
>
>Thanks,
>
>-Josh
>jmore AT remote-print DOT com
>
>
>
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
99.21% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>