Re: EXB-8700, 160m XL tapes, and tapetype
2002-09-30 22:43:10
Bob Tanner wrote:
amanda-2.4.3b4
EXB-8700 Tape Drive
Exabyte 160M XL tapes
Got amanda configured. But amdump keeps erroring out. I used the EXB-8500 as my
template for the EXB-8700. But since amdump wasn't working, I ran tapetype.
Here is how I ran it:
# /usr/sbin/tapetype -f /dev/nst0
This is what I get back:
wrote 21909 32Kb blocks in 67 files in 1713 seconds (short write)
wrote 22168 32Kb blocks in 136 files in 1990 seconds (short write)
define tapetype unknown-tapetype {
comment "just produced by tapetype program"
length 705232 kbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 382 kps
}
Can the filemark really be 0? I'm not 100% sure what that does or if it's
related to my problem of amanda not working.
The filemark is just a way for tape systems to waste tape...be glad that
it's zero...the real question is what is the advertised capacity of
these tapes? Did you turn off hardware compression? What is the error
given in the logs?
=G=
|
Previous by Date: |
EXB-8700, 160m XL tapes, and tapetype, Bob Tanner |
Next by Date: |
Re: EXB-8700, 160m XL tapes, and tapetype, Bob Tanner |
Previous by Thread: |
EXB-8700, 160m XL tapes, and tapetype, Bob Tanner |
Next by Thread: |
Re: EXB-8700, 160m XL tapes, and tapetype, Bob Tanner |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|