ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Best Practices/Best Performance SP/TSM B/A Client Settings ?

2017-03-27 15:15:58
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Best Practices/Best Performance SP/TSM B/A Client Settings ?
From: Tom Alverson <tom.alverson AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:10:44 -0400
Our biggest performance issue is with SQL backups of large databases. Our
DBA's all want full backups ever night (and log backups every hour) and for
the databases that are around 1TB the backup will start at Midnight and
finish 5 to 13 hours later (varies day to day).  When these backups start
extending into the daytime hours they complain but I don't know how we
could improve the speed.  Our Storage servers all have 10GB interfaces but
they are backing up hundreds of clients every night (mostly incremental
file level backups).  I am running a test right now to see if
RESOURCEUTILIZATION 10 helps one of these database backups but I suspect it
will make no difference as 99% of the data is all in one DB and I don't
think SQL/TSM will split that into multiple streams (will it?).

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Del Hoobler <hoobler AT us.ibm DOT com> wrote:

> Hi Tom,
>
> My original posting was an excerpt from best practices for container
> pools, and does not necessarily apply to other storage pool types.
>
> Yes, client-side deduplication and compression options should be avoided
> with a Data Domain storage pool.
>
> A fixed resourceutilization setting of 2 may underperform for clients that
> have a lot of data to back up and fast network connections, but this is
> not a black and white answer. There are various other conditions that can
> affect this and trying to narrow in on them in ADSM-L would be difficult.
> If you want some help with a performance issue, please open a PMR.
>
>
> Del
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 03/25/2017
> 12:20:43 AM:
>
> > From: Tom Alverson <tom.alverson AT GMAIL DOT COM>
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Date: 03/25/2017 05:40 AM
> > Subject: Re: Best Practices/Best Performance SP/TSM B/A Client Settings
> ?
> > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> >
> > Del:
> >
> > We have been using these settings as our defaults.  Is our TCPWINDOWSIZE
> > too large?
> >
> > RESOURCEUTILIZATION 2  (we increase this up to 10 for some WAN backups)
> > TXNBYTELIMIT 2097152
> > TCPNODELAY YES
> > TCPBUFFSIZE 512
> > TCPWINDOWSIZE 2048
> > LARGECOMMBUFFERS YES
> >
> > Also we never use compression because our storage folks believe it will
> > foul up the de-duplication that happens on our Data Domains??
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Del Hoobler <hoobler AT us.ibm DOT com> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ben,
> > >
> > > Here are some items to get you started:
> > >
> > >
> > > Backup-Archive client with limited, high latency network (WAN
> backups):
> > > ===============================
> > > TCPWINDOWSIZE           512
> > > RESOURCEUTILIZATION     4
> > > COMPRESSION             Yes
> > > DEDUPLICATION           Yes
> > > ENABLEDEDUPCACHE        Yes
> > >
> > > Tip:  Do not use the client deduplication caching for applications
> that
> > > use the IBM Spectrum Protect API.  Refer to section 1.2.3.2.1 for
> > > additional details.
> > >
> > >
> > > Backup/Archive client or Client API with limited network (Gigabit LAN
> > > backups):
> > > ===============================
> > > TCPWINDOWSIZE           512
> > > RESOURCEUTILIZATION     10
> > > COMPRESSION             Yes
> > > DEDUPLICATION           Yes
> > > ENABLEDEDUPCACHE        No
> > >
> > >
> > > Backup/Archive client or Client API with high speed network (10
> Gigabit +
> > > LAN backups)
> > > ===============================
> > > TCPWINDOWSIZE           512
> > > RESOURCEUTILIZATION     10
> > > COMPRESSION             No
> > > DEDUPLICATION           No
> > > ENABLEDEDUPCACHE        No
> > >
> > >
> > > Tip:  For optimal data reduction, avoid the following client option
> > > combination:
> > >
> > > COMPRESSION     Yes
> > > DEDUPLICATION   No
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Del
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 
> > > 03/15/2017
> > > 02:39:04 PM:
> > >
> > > > From: "Alford, Ben" <balford AT UTK DOT EDU>
> > > > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > > > Date: 03/15/2017 02:39 PM
> > > > Subject: Best Practices/Best Performance SP/TSM B/A Client Settings
> ?
> > > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> > > >
> > > > I've looked at the IBM Blueprint documents but may have missed what
> > > > I was looking for - the Best Practices for Best Performance for TSM
> > > > B/A client settings.    As we move from 6.4 to 7.x or 8.x clients
> > > > before the 6.4 EOL, we are looking to test with the current client
> > > > settings optimized for things like TCPBUFFSIZE, TCPWINDOWSIZE,
> > > > TXNBYTLIMIT, etc., etc.
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Ben Alford
> > > > IT Manager, Office of Information Technology
> > > > Systems: Shared Services
> > > >
> > > > The University of Tennessee
> > > >
> > >
> >
>