ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] When can too many disk volumes be detrimental

2016-01-27 11:37:11
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] When can too many disk volumes be detrimental
From: "Alford, Ben" <balford AT UTK DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:34:15 +0000
If you never move ANYthing else to Flash, move the TSM DB there.   As someone 
else mentioned, it is like a religious experience.  Our expirations went from 3 
hours to 10 minutes.

Ben Alford 
IT Manager, Office of Information Technology
The University of Tennessee


-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Skylar Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 11:07 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] When can too many disk volumes be detrimental

I would actually keep DB and logs separate, avoid putting the DB on RAID-5 due 
to its high write penalty. We have our DB on 15K RPM SAS disks in 3x 4-disk 
RAID-10 sets. The logs we keep on RAID-1 collocated with the OS, since it's 
pretty low load and all sequential I/O.

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:02:25AM -0500, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> The box came with 6-6TB drives and 4-slots empty. We moved 6-600GB SAS 
> drives into the empty slots and created another RAID5 array of ~1.7TB 
> for additional storage. Sounds like maybe we should move the 
> DB/logs/archlogs to it?

--
-- Skylar Thompson (skylar2 AT u.washington DOT edu)
-- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
-- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354
-- University of Washington School of Medicine