ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Exchange TDP and Export weirdness

2014-08-05 00:06:17
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Exchange TDP and Export weirdness
From: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT ICFI DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 04:04:13 +0000
- it's a primary volume
- what TOC/metadata would be called for by an EXPORT of 1 Exchange TDP 
filespace?  
I've done a select on the contents of the tape, and there is nothing on it but 
Exchange TDP filespaces.



-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Grant Street
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 9:24 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Exchange TDP and Export weirdness

On 05/08/14 07:14, Prather, Wanda wrote:
> TSM server 6.3.4 on Win2K8 64
> Exchange 2010 in a DAG configuration, 22 DB's TDP for Exchange 6.4.0 
> We run fulls on Saturday, incrementals Sun-Fri.
>
> Trying to Export a set of Exchange backups for *one* DB/filespace to 
> sequential media for legal hold.
> Here's the command:
>
> EXPORT NODE xxxxx-dag1 fsid=19 filedata=all fromdate=05/10/2014 
> todate=05/16/2014 fromtime=04:00 totime=23:59 devclass=lto
>
> xxxxx-dag1 is the storage node that holds all the Exchange DB filespaces.
> There was a full backup run starting 05/10/2014 at 08:00.
>
> So here's the weirdness:
> The Export runs a while, mounts some of the tapes you'd expect, then calls 
> for a tape whose last write date is 04/25/2014.
>
> That fails the job because that tape is offsite.  I don't mind getting that 
> tape back from the vault for processing, except that something is clearly 
> hosed here, and I wonder if *any* of the data going on my export tape is 
> correct.
>
> Anybody seen something like this before?
> I have even done a query on the BACKUPs table to verify there are no objects 
> of type DIR in that filespace.
> I'm flummoxed.
>
The tape that causes the failure is it a primary volume or a copy volume?
If it's a copy volume, then TSM can't access the primary volume so there is 
something wrong.

The tape could be a TOC/windows metadata pool.

Grant

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>