Re: [ADSM-L] Why?

Subject:	Re: [ADSM-L] Why?
From:	Steven Langdale <steven.langdale AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To:	ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date:	Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:25:24 +0000

There are quite a few operations that take the VTL offline.  The word
"temporary"  is a bit of a stretch too.  Mine take 25 mins to go offline
and back. Though I understand the time relates to the size of the VTL.

Agreed though,  hardly "enterprise class".
 On 24 Feb 2014 14:44, "Remco Post" <r.post AT plcs DOT nl> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I just noticed something disturbing in the protectier manual: "The
> ProtecTIER system temporarily goes offline to...." WTF!?!? Did I just read
> that correctly? Imagine a disk system going offline every time you add a
> LUN....
>
> --
>
> Remco Post
> remco AT plcs DOT nl
> 06-248 21 622

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ADSM-L] Why?, Remco Post Re: [ADSM-L] Why?, Steven Langdale <= [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN, Huebner, Andy Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN, Mike De Gasperis Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN, Huebner, Andy Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN, Mike De Gasperis Message not available Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN, Rick Saylor Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN, Huebner, Andy Message not available Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN, Rick Saylor Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN, Huebner, Andy Re: [ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN, Richard Rhodes

Previous by Date:	Re: [ADSM-L] ALL Tapes known to TSM, George Huebschman
Next by Date:	[ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN, Huebner, Andy
Previous by Thread:	[ADSM-L] Why?, Remco Post
Next by Thread:	[ADSM-L] Redundant Tape SAN, Huebner, Andy
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]