Re: [ADSM-L] TSM for VE sizing vs standard incremental forever
2013-05-15 17:25:06
Steve, we perform weekly full backups and nightly incremental backups to tape
(LTO5). We are using version 6.4 of the baclient and TSM for VE, which allows
incremental forever--we do not use that option. The highest daily change I see
during the nightly incremental backups is about 25%. The average is around
8-10%.
Ray Storer
NIBCO INC.
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Steven Harris
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 5:20 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM for VE sizing vs standard incremental forever
Hi All
I've been asked to do some ballpark sizing for a major rework of a TSM
environment. Clients are linux and Windows under Vmware
This customer has been using standard BA client backups up until now, ie
incremental forever, and the new env will be TSM for VE with the backend being
tape rather than disk so no dedup possible.
Given that TSM for VE uses some funky differential backup technology on the
changed blocks, how much data does your typical VE installation backup per day
per protected TB? Anyone with real world data out there? Sorry it is such an
open question but anything you can give me is better than a stab inthe dark.
Regards
Steve
Steven Harris
TSM Admin
Canberra Australia
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please
notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message
and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
|
|
|