Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool
2011-10-18 10:54:34
Allen,
We are running 6.2.3 (just upgraded from 6.2.2 2 days ago) on two p740s, each
with 8 CPUs (32 vCPUs) and 128GB of RAM. 10 TSM instances total spread across
these two systems. One has 3, the other 7.
System 1 DB sizes (Space Used by DB):
1) 258GB
2) 289GB
3) 287GB
System 2 DB sizes:
1) 172GB
2) 173GB
3) 39GB
4) 84GB
5) 317GB
6) 98GB
7) 1GB (dedicated shared library manager server)
- We do not do deduplication (yet).
- We have CPU to spare (will get used when we enable deduplication).
- We ingest ~20TB per day across all instances. We use copy pools for all data
(to a remote tape library).
I am not sure whether we will have sufficient CPU available to do all of the
deduplication that we wish to. Same for RAM. The "best practices" have
changed a couple of times since we originally started looking at this.
HTH.
..Paul
At 08:54 AM 10/17/2011, Allen S. Rout wrote:
>Please elaborate on your experiences w.r.t. memory footprint?
>
>It's my major planning unknown; I'm musing about instance count
>vs. size.
>
>
>- Allen S. Rout
--
Paul Zarnowski Ph: 607-255-4757
Manager, Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521
719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801 Em: psz1 AT cornell DOT edu
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, (continued)
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Robert Clark
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Prather, Wanda
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Allen S. Rout
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Stefan Folkerts
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Prather, Wanda
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool,
Paul Zarnowski <=
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Allen S. Rout
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Shawn Drew
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Allen S. Rout
- [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Ben Bullock
- [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Thorneycroft, Doug
- Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Ben Bullock
- [ADSM-L] Check signals on Power vs. x86..., Allen S. Rout
- Re: [ADSM-L] Check signals on Power vs. x86..., Howard Coles
|
|
|