|
Re: [ADSM-L] Determining devclass FILE values (a.k.a. New Server - Part Deux)
2010-09-22 11:29:12
On Wednesday 22 September 2010, you wrote:
> On Friday 17 September 2010, Stef Coene wrote:
> > When we changed the FILE based storage pool to 5 GB volumes, the result
> > was
>
> much better. There was less reclamation needed because it is less likely
> that a volume has a status Filling.
>
>
> Interesting concept Stef...just the opposite of what I did to fix the
> problem. I'll give this a try also. Have you seen any downside to this
> due to the large number of files in a given directory? I'm running RHEL
> 5.4 64 bit on ext3.
This is an AIX server with a 7 TB jfs2 filesystem with 1381 files in it.
For now, no downside found.
Why have you changed to bigger FILE volumes?
And do you use a DISK based storage pool as 'buffer'?
Stef
|
|
|
