ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrading Windows client with multiple schedules/nodes

2010-03-09 13:34:18
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrading Windows client with multiple schedules/nodes
From: Grigori Solonovitch <G.Solonovitch AT BKME DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:29:25 +0300
We have upgraded a lot of servers from 5.5.1 to 6.1.x (just TSM Clients, TSM 
Clients and TDP for Exchange/SQL/Oracle, clusters with multi-node 
configuration) without any modifications in schedules after upgrade.

________________________________________
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan 
Forray/AC/VCU [zforray AT VCU DOT EDU]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 7:17 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Upgrading Windows client with multiple schedules/nodes

We want to upgrade the client (5.5->6.1) on a Windows server that is split
into multiple partitions and thus has multiple nodes and associated
schedules.

Will the 6.1.3.2 install process disturb the client schedules, which have
been manually installed/configured?  We really don't want to have to redo
all the scheduler services, if at all possible.
Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zforray AT vcu DOT edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html

Please consider the environment before printing this Email.

"This email message and any attachments transmitted with it may contain 
confidential and proprietary information, intended only for the named 
recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, or if you are not the 
named recipient(s), please delete this email after notifying the sender 
immediately. BKME cannot guarantee the integrity of this communication and 
accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due 
to viruses, any other defects, interception or unauthorized modification. The 
information, views, opinions and comments of this message are those of the 
individual and not necessarily endorsed by BKME."

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>