ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] TDP for Exchange

2007-11-19 11:29:15
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TDP for Exchange
From: CAYE PIERRE <Pierre.Caye AT ALCATEL-LUCENT DOT FR>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:28:31 +0100
Hi,

I can confirm you that it is the case, for each different retention you need a 
different node, unless you will face rebinding of all data's to the last 
management class used at each backup.
And it will be the same for all TDP using backup copy group.

Pierre 

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] De 
> la part de Adrian Compton
> Envoyé : lundi 19 novembre 2007 14:30
> À : ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] TDP for Exchange
> 
> Hi Richard
> 
> Thanks for confirming that. I presumed it was much the same 
> as MSSQL TDP that requires different nodes for each 
> Management class requried.
> 
> I'll try that and see if it solves the retention problem.
> 
> Regards
> Adrian  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Sims [mailto:rbs AT bu DOT edu]
> Sent: 19 November 2007 15:13 PM
> To: Adrian Compton
> Subject: Re: TDP for Exchange
> 
> Hi, Adrian -
> 
> I can't tell from the info, but if all the schedules are 
> using the same node, filespace, and file names, then you will 
> certainly end up with a rebinding problem.
> 
>     Richard Sims
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>