Re: [ADSM-L] Good or bad idea?...offsite disk.

2007-04-03 11:47:22
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Good or bad idea?...offsite disk.
From: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:46:50 -0400
>> On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:50:21 -0400, "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT ufl DOT edu> 
>> said:

> In imitation of that, I'm considering a library of LIBT FILE, with
> predefined FILE volumes on paths accessible to all of the client
> instances.  Then the library manager hands out individual volumes,
> which are (promptly, I hope) backed up, migrated off to tape, and
> then returned to the lib mgr.

For those who were wondering what I was smoking, the answer is "I have
no idea, but It's worn off now".

I don't know how I arrived at the (clear and strong) impression that I
could share FILE devices in the way I described.  But, attempting to
test it I found I was unambiguously mistaken. :)

I guess that's an anticannibalism measure protecting the SANERGY
product.  (like you'd want to do that over NFS. Hah) Oh well.

- Allen S. Rout

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>