ADSM-L

Re: tsm tape path problems

2005-07-07 00:07:28
Subject: Re: tsm tape path problems
From: nghiatd <nghiatd2 AT FPT.COM DOT VN>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:19:35 +0700
I also met  your situation. I update library/drive path again and they work
well.

>Whereas TSM used to
> call the devices: lb6.0.0.3 (library), mt1.0.0.3 (drive 1), and mt2.0.0.3
> (drive 2); TSM is now calling those devices lb6.0.0.5, mt1.0.0.5, and
> mt2.0.0.5.

You try to implement following commads :

UPDATE PATH TSM_SERVER1 LB6.0.0.3 SRCTYPE=SERVER DESTTYPE=LIBRARY
DEVICE=lb6.0.0.5 ONLINE=YES



UPDATE PATH TSM_SERVER1 MT1.0.0.3 SRCTYPE=SERVER DESTTYPE=DRIVE
LIBRARY=LB6.0.0.3

DEVICE=mt1.0.0.5 ONLINE=YES

UPDATE PATH TSM_SERVER1 MT2.0.0.3 SRCTYPE=SERVER DESTTYPE=DRIVE
LIBRARY=LB6.0.0.3 DEVICE=mt2.0.0.5 ONLINE=YES

Good luck,

Nghiatd








----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexander Lazarevich" <alazarev AT ITG.UIUC DOT EDU>
To: <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 10:21 AM
Subject: tsm tape path problems


> TSM 5.1.9.0 on win2K server. Overland Neo 4100 with 2 LTO-2 drives.
>
> I've got a bad problem, and I'm stuck trying to read the manual for clues
> but I'm having trouble finding what I need to know and I could really use
> a point in the right direction.
>
> TSM has been running just fine since I set it up more than two years ago.
> I used the TSM wizard to set everything up, and it was quite easy. Last
> week we had an LTO-2 drive failure, some bad cables, and an intermittent
> library controller card. All those hardware issues have been fixed.
>
> But somewhere in the mess of fixing all the hardware issues, the TSM
> /windows drivers for the devices got confused, and TSM is now recognizing
> the library and the drives as different device names. Whereas TSM used to
> call the devices: lb6.0.0.3 (library), mt1.0.0.3 (drive 1), and mt2.0.0.3
> (drive 2); TSM is now calling those devices lb6.0.0.5, mt1.0.0.5, and
> mt2.0.0.5.
>
> I've tried everything I know of to fix the path between the server and the
> "old" devices (lb6.0.0.3), but nothing I tried worked. So, I then set
> out to try and define new path's for the "new" devices (lb6.0.0.5). I've
> done the following:
>
> - Define the new library and drives, giving them the proper names
>    and element ID's.
> - Update the server's LTO Device Class, giving it the new library name
>    lb6.0.0.5.
> - Add the new path's for the drives and the library:
> tsm: ITG-TSM>q path
>
> Source Name     Source Type     Destination     Destination     On-Line
>                                  Name            Type
> -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -------
> ITG-TSM         SERVER          LB6.0.0.5       LIBRARY         Yes
> ITG-TSM         SERVER          MT1.0.0.5       DRIVE           Yes
> ITG-TSM         SERVER          MT2.0.0.5       DRIVE           Yes
>
> But then I try to run an audit of the new library, and I get nothing:
>
> ANR2017I Administrator ALAZAREV issued command: AUDIT LIBRARY lb6.0.0.5
> ANR0984I Process 5 for AUDIT LIBRARY started in the BACKGROUND at
> 21:42:02.
> ANR8457I AUDIT LIBRARY: Operation for library LB6.0.0.5 started as process
> 5.
> ANR8461I AUDIT LIBRARY process for library LB6.0.0.5 completed
> successfully.
> ANR0985I Process 5 for AUDIT LIBRARY running in the BACKGROUND completed
> with completion state SUCCESS at 21:42:02.
>
> The audit did nothing, as it starts and completes within a second. The
> library didn't move an inch.
>
> Obviously, I'm not setting up the paths properly, or the devices classes,
> or something. What I find odd is that when I run the Device Configuration
> Wizard, TSM does not find any devices. That is different from when I first
> installed TSM, when it found all devices automatically for me.
>
> I'm going to read Chapter 4 of the admin guide tonight when I go home, but
> I've already looked at it, and I can't find the information I need
> described in a clear manner. Any help anyone could provide, even just
> pointing me to some good documentation, I would appreciate it.
>
> Sorry to be a pest, but I'm in trouble, as our backups are down and I need
> a little help getting it back up.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Alex
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>