ADSM-L

Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance issues resolved or not.

2005-03-19 06:45:14
Subject: Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance issues resolved or not.
From: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 06:44:35 -0500
Paul -

This generally falls under the TSM term Restore Order processing. We've
discussed it on the List before. I have an entry on it in ADSM
QuickFacts which you can refer to as a preliminary to further pursuit
in IBM doc.

  Richard Sims    http://people.bu.edu/rbs

On Mar 19, 2005, at 3:06 AM, Paul Fielding wrote:

I'd be interested in more discussion on this point.   My original
understanding was actually a bit different that that.  The impression
I had
was that originally directory tree structures were restored before any
files
happened, period. Following that, files would be restored.  Net result
-
tapes might get mounted twice.

Is my understanding incorrect? (could well be).  If this behavior has
indeed
been fixed so that directories are restored as they are hit on the tape
(with a pre-created non-ACLed directory being created first) then it
would
indeed make sense that a DIRMC pool is no longer needed.

Is there any documentation on this somewhere I can reference?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>