?Can Linux (or Win?) replace AIX for hosting an I/O intensive TSM service?
After scanning the past year's ADSM-L postings including Linux in the subject
I have the impression that a few people are playing with Linux hosting a TSM
service, but real I/O intensive TSM services are still mainly hosted by AIX.
?Is anyone already using or actively planning to use Linux (RedHat EL 3.0?)
to host an I/O intensive TSM service similar to any described under the
recent ADSM-L thread, "Sizing an AIX platform and tape libraries"?
We believe we are approaching the maximum that can be achieved w/
TSM: v5.2.1.3
OS: AIX 5.1 (64bit)
CPU: IBM 7025-6F1 w/ 4 * 750Mhz proc's + 3GB RAM
SAN: 1 Gb w/ EMC Symmetrix 8830
LAN: 1 Gb Ethernet
ATL: IBM 3494 w/ 6 * 3590E drives
IBM 3584 w/ 4 * 3580 LTO1 + 2 * 3580 LTO2 drives
This configuration is successfully supporting our current ITS TSM service
(see details below), but we believe we either need a major performance
boost or to split this load onto an additional host platform:
Linux, Win*, or must we remain w/ AIX for I/O performance?
to handle expected additional growth.
Which platform have you chosen (or would you choose) for similar TSM service?
Yale ITS TSM Service:
--------------------
Active Clients: 2400 <= 3d, 2500 <= 7d, 2700 <= 35days
Servers: 151
WinNT,2K* 105
Linux 20
Solaris 9
AIX 7
SQL-BT (Oracle) 3
Mac 2
TDP's: MSSQL,MSexchg: 2 + 1
[new] 2
Personals: 2549
WinNT,2K*,XP 2230
Win98,ME 26
Mac 183
Linux 50
Solaris 5
AIX,DEC*X,HPUX,IRIX: 1 ea.
[new] 51
Expected growth: +500-600 clients for several years
+20% data for existing clients/year?
TSM DB: 75.7% of 160GB
BAckup DB w/ LTO1 HCmpr. takes 2.3h
EXPIre Inv examines ~6M obj, deletes ~1M obj. in 8-9h
Disk STGpools: 600 + 180GB
Nightly Backup Period: 15:30-08:00+
Weeknight Backup Load: 500-650GB+
Thanks for any experience/insight you are willing to share with us!
--
Jim.Owen AT Yale DOT Edu (203.432.6693)
|