ADSM-L

Re: encryption: 56 to 128

2003-11-27 10:58:03
Subject: Re: encryption: 56 to 128
From: Remco Post <r.post AT SARA DOT NL>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:57:33 +0100
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:41:34 -0500
Joe Crnjanski <JCrnjanski AT INFINITYNETWORK DOT COM> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Does anybody know if IBM is planning to upgrade their famous encryption
> from 56 to 128 bit at least. Not to mention that today on market 512 bit
> is not very difficult to find in other softwares.
>
> We lost couple of customers because they requested at least 128 bit
> encryption.
>
> I know that IBM's argument is effect on speed of backup, but GIVE US A
> CHANCE to choose and we can decide when to use 56 128 or 1024 bit.
>

IBM also arguments, rightfully, that if you need stronger encryption, you'll
probably need to encrypt the files while they are stored on your disk as
well. After some thought, I think I'll have to agree. Remember even 56bit
des can currently not that easily be cracked by anyone who is not in the
business of cracking strong encryption for a living.


> Joe Crnjanski
> Infinity Network Solutions Inc.
> Phone: 416-235-0931 x26
> Fax:     416-235-0265
> Web:  www.infinitynetwork.com


--
Met vriendelijke groeten,

Remco Post

SARA - Reken- en Netwerkdiensten                      http://www.sara.nl
High Performance Computing  Tel. +31 20 592 8008    Fax. +31 20 668 3167

"I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer
industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry
didn't even foresee that the century was going to end." -- Douglas Adams

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>