ADSM-L

Re: TSM Storage Pool Hierarchy Question

2003-10-21 09:30:12
Subject: Re: TSM Storage Pool Hierarchy Question
From: Zlatko Krastev <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:54:25 +0300
1. It is possible
2. No, you need the DRM license (part of Extended Edition) to have
server-to-server virtual volumes
3. To the virtual volumes device class, i.e. to a file stored in "MS"
server
3b. Yes, it depends on the destination setting of the "MS" server
copygroup
4. See the answers to q.3 & 3b.
999. No matter of the setup or version :-) You just need enough "RS" disks
and rather good pipe to "MS".


Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Curt Watts <cwatts AT CAPCOLLEGE.BC DOT CA>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
21.10.2003 02:41
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        cc:
        Subject:        TSM Storage Pool Hierarchy Question


Alright, time to ask the experts!

Essentially, I'm trying to have our remote TSM servers (satellite
locations) utilize the main TSM server as the next storage pool in it's
hierarchy.

The hierarchy will eventually look like this:

Remote Server (RS) Disk Cache
  -Main Server (MS) Disk Cache
     -MS Tape Pool
         -MS Offsite Copy Pool

Questions I have:
1) Is this possible?
2) Can I do this without the DR module?
3) How does the RS backup it's database - because it won't backup to
the local disk?
3b) Should the RS backup it's DB directly to tape? and if so, how is it
possible to share the tape library with no NAS?
4) Should I just break down and put some tape drives out there to
handle the DBs?

Current setup:
  MS: W2k sp4, TSM v4.3.2, IBM 3853 w/ 54 slots & 2 LTO drives.
  RS: W2k sp4, TSM v5.2.0

Thanks everyone.

Curt Watts

_______________________________________________
Curt Watts
Network Analyst, Capilano College
cwatts AT capcollege.bc DOT ca

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>