Re: Semote storage pool
2003-02-18 18:00:47
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:46:05PM -0500, Remeta, Mark wrote:
>> It doesn't matter how you use it. Forcing TSM to work its I/O at network
>> speeds when it is designed to work at bus speeds will show badly. You'll
>> be disappointed.
> I agree.. besides that's what off-site copy pools are for!
I have a 1 Gbit link between my primary site and my backup site, and I'm
actully consindering using a Linux box with a lot of disk space NFS
mounted on my TSM server as copypool, just to scratch the complexity of
offsite tape managment. I don't see the big difference between network
speed and bus speed when I'm running Gbit network, can you elaborate?
--
Best Regards
Emil S. Hansen - esh AT pop3.bit DOT dk - ESH14-DK
UNIX Administrator, Berlingske IT - www.bit.dk
PGP: 109375FA/ABEB 1EFA A764 529E 82B5 0943 AD3B 1FC2 1093 75FA
"Gravity can not be held responsible for people falling in love."
- Albert Einstein
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Semote storage pool, GUILLAUMONT Etienne
- Re: Semote storage pool, Jozef Zatko
- Re: Semote storage pool, Chandrasekhar, C.R
- Re: Semote storage pool, Jozef Zatko
- Re: Semote storage pool, Stapleton, Mark
- Re: Semote storage pool, GUILLAUMONT Etienne
- Re: Semote storage pool, Stapleton, Mark
- Re: Semote storage pool, Remeta, Mark
- Re: Semote storage pool,
Emil S. Hansen <=
- Re: Semote storage pool, GUILLAUMONT Etienne
- Re: Semote storage pool, Jozef Zatko
- Re: Semote storage pool, Richard Sims
- Re: Semote storage pool, Stapleton, Mark
|
|
|