Yes, I thought so too. What good is it if features come out and they don't
work everywhere?

I don't recall anyone on the list mentioned this so I didn't think about it
either.

TSM Support just informed me that's why it's working on the 2 other drives
and not this one.

Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Engineer
SAIC
E-Mail:   gillg AT saic DOT com
Phone:  (858) 826-4062
Pager:   (877) 905-7154


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Whitlow, Don [mailto:Don.Whitlow AT QG DOT COM]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 11:25 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: Journaling
>
> I may be adding more questions than I am answering, but why should it
matter
> if a disk is SAN-based vs. DAS (local)? I would assume journaling would
work
> at the drive letter (logical) level, meaning it would be clueless as to
the
> underlying disk access method. To the O/S and software, it should just
look
> like a drive/volume.
>
> Maybe I'm missing something more to the puzzle. But I would think it would
> work for you.
>
> Good luck
> Don
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:GEOFFREY.L.GILL AT SAIC DOT COM]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 12:28 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Journaling
>
>
> Ok I finally figured out why journaling is not working on this server.
It's
> because the 4 million plus files are on a SAN attached disk and journaling
> does not support that, only local.
>
> What good is that????? Is there any good reason to use SAN disk these days
> anyway?
> Geoff Gill
> TSM Administrator
> NT Systems Support Engineer
> SAIC
> E-Mail:    <mailto:gillg AT saic DOT com> gillg AT saic DOT com
> Phone:  (858) 826-4062
> Pager:   (877) 905-7154