ADSM-L

Re: netware client 5.1.5 cluster support

2002-10-25 05:53:26
Subject: Re: netware client 5.1.5 cluster support
From: Dirk Billerbeck <dirk.billerbeck AT GECITS-EU DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:51:29 +0100
Hi Dave,

I don't know the Netware Cluster but AFAIK you should use separate TSM
client nodes for the local drives and each "clustergroup" (or whatever this
is called in the Netware cluster) and its drives. Each TSM node has its own
dsm.opt and uses as DOMAIN only the drives that are local to him. This way
you don't have to deal with failover issues and available/unavailable
drives on a cluster member.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Met vriendelijke groeten,
With best regards,
Bien amicalement,

CU/2,
                Dirk Billerbeck


Dirk Billerbeck
GE CompuNet Kiel
Enterprise Computing Solutions
Am Jaegersberg 20, 24161 Altenholz (Kiel), Germany
Phone: +49 (0) 431 / 3609 - 117, Fax: +49 (0) 431 / 3609 - 190,
Internet: dirk.billerbeck @ gecits-eu.com


This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient,
you must not disclose or use the information contained in it.
If you have received this mail in error, please tell us
immediately by return email and delete the document.





Dave.Frost AT SUNGARD DOT [email protected] on 25.10.2002 10:32:28

Please respond to ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU

Sent by: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU


To:      ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:
Subject: netware client 5.1.5 cluster support
                                                                            
                                                                            
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



Hi *sm people:

I have an issue with the latest Netware client 5.1.5

I have been waiting for the cluster support in the 5.1.5 client
Now it seems I can not backup all clustered drives and NDS
I see others have used nds: sys: vol1: etc
I can not specify the drives to backup in the option file because this
varies depending on the failover status of the clustered drives
Does anyone have any ideas?

Regards

Dave


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>