Re: Audit Library question.
2002-10-22 15:39:53
This seems to be library dependent. We've had both an STK 9710 and an IBM
3584. Both of these libraries, as a function of library startup (or after
the door had been opened/closed) would scan all slots and build an in-memory
list of volumes and slots in the controller.
Any TSM library audit with checklabel=barcode just gets back the volser and
slot from the library; if the library has an internal memory, it should come
from there. Without an internal data store of some kind, it will need to
scan the tapes.
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Murray, Jim [mailto:JMurray AT LIBERTY-BANK DOT COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:46 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: Audit Library question.
>
>
> Not so here with an ATL 7100 checklabel=barcode and it Always
> moves up and
> down the rows, can only assume it is reading as it goes.
>
> Jim Murray
> Senior Systems Engineer
> Liberty Bank
> 860.638.2919
> jmurray AT liberty-bank DOT com
> "I hear and I forget.
> I see and I remember.
> I do and I understand."
> -Confucius
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Todd Lundstedt [mailto:Todd_Lundstedt AT VIA-CHRISTI DOT ORG]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 14:28
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: Audit Library question.
>
>
> Not true on my library, Ken...
> I have run several audits using checklabel=barcode before
> with success.
> The arm has never moved in the library with an audit using checkl=b.
>
>
>
> |--------+------------------------>
> | | KEN HORACEK |
> | | <KHORACEK@INCS|
> | | YSTEM.COM> |
> | | Sent by: |
> | | "ADSM: Dist |
> | | Stor Manager" |
> | | <ADSM-L AT VM DOT MAR|
> | | IST.EDU> |
> | | |
> | | |
> | | 10/22/2002 |
> | | 01:03 PM |
> | | Please respond|
> | | to "ADSM: Dist|
> | | Stor Manager" |
> | | |
> |--------+------------------------>
>
> >-------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> --------------------------------------------|
> |
> |
> | To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> |
> | cc:
> |
> | Fax to:
> |
> | Subject: Re: Audit Library question.
> |
>
> >-------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> --------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
> Not true.......
> With checklabel=barcode, all of the barcodes are read. This is then
> checked with the internal memory of the library as to what
> the library's
> inventory says is where. The tape is mounted, only if the barcode is
> mis-read.
>
> Ken
> khoracek AT incsystem DOT com
>
>
> >>> msimpson AT UKY DOT EDU 10/22/2002 10:44:50 AM >>>
> At 11:29 AM -0400 10/22/02, David Longo said:
> >With checklabel=barcode, what happens is that TSM reads the internal
> >memory of the library as to what the library's inventory says is
> >where.
>
> So checklabel=barcode doesn't really mean read the barcodes? It just
> means check the library's internal memory? I guess that's still
> useful in some circumstances, if there'e a possibility that TSM and
> the library have gotten out of sync.
> But it would be nice if things mean what they say. Suppose I really
> want it to read the barcodes? Suppose I think the library's internal
> memory has gotten confused somehow, and I want to do a physical
> audit of barcode locations to compare with the internal memory? Is
> this possible? Or is it a function of the library (which I guess
> might make more sense).
>
> >So generally that won't take long. And a drive needs to be available
> >for
> >the case where library had a problem reading a barcode label, that
> >tape
> >can be mounted in a tape drive to verify - even if using checkl=b.
>
> But how can it have a problem reading the barcode label if check-=b
> doesn't even try to read the labels?
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Matt Simpson -- OS/390 Support
> 219 McVey Hall -- (859) 257-2900 x300
> University Of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506
> <mailto:msimpson AT uky DOT edu>
> mainframe -- An obsolete device still used by thousands of obsolete
> companies serving billions of obsolete customers and making
> huge obsolete
> profits for their obsolete shareholders. And this year's run
> twice as fast
> as last year's.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
> proprietary information, and may be used only by the person
> or entity to
> which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not
> the intended
> recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is
> hereby notified
> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> notify the
> sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
> -----------------------------------------------------
> <<<<GWIASIG 0.07>>>>
>
>
> ________________________________________________
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person
> or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
> and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended
> recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use,
> review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction
> or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited.
> If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
> delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed
> in this message are those of the individual sender and may
> not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
> ________________________________________________
>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Audit Library question., (continued)
- Re: Audit Library question., David Longo
- Re: Audit Library question., David Longo
- Re: Audit Library question., David Longo
- Re: Audit Library question., KEN HORACEK
- Re: Audit Library question., Todd Lundstedt
- Re: Audit Library question., Cook, Dwight E
- Re: Audit Library question., Todd Lundstedt
- Re: Audit Library question., Murray, Jim
- Re: Audit Library question.,
Kauffman, Tom <=
- Re: Audit Library question., KEN HORACEK
- Re: Audit Library question., David Longo
- Re: Audit Library question., KEN HORACEK
- Re: Audit Library question., Tab Trepagnier
|
|
|