ADSM-L

exclude syntax frustration

2015-10-04 17:13:40
Subject: exclude syntax frustration
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU=20
TSM seems to ignore our exclude statements, no matter which wildcard syntax
we use. For example, we have filesystems called /db1/oracle, /db2/oracle,
etc. through /db30/oracle that we want to exclude. We've tried:
exclude /db[1-30]/oracle/.../*
and
exclude /db*/oracle/.../*
and
exclude /.../oracle/.../*
without success: in each case, the backups still try to backup the files
under these directories. The backups usually fail to pick up the files,
because the files change during the backup, which is why we want to exclude
them.
Are we misunderstanding how wildcards are supposed to work with exclude
statements? Or is this a product bug?

Peter Glass
Distributed Storage Management (DSM)
Wells Fargo Services Company
> * 612-667-0086   * 866-407-5362
> * peter.k.glass AT wellsfargo DOT com=20
>



"MMS <health-first.org>" made the following
 annotations on 01/04/02 20:40:43
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
---
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain =
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain =
confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information.  No =
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If =
you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all =
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify th=
e=
 sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, =
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended =
recipient.  Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail =
communications through its networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in =
this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where th=
e=
 message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity=
;=
  and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or =
opinions.

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>