ADSM-L

Re: Scratching empty tapes

2001-08-30 08:43:03
Subject: Re: Scratching empty tapes
From: Lindsay Morris <lmorris AT SERVERGRAPH DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 08:41:28 -0400
You might post "q vol" and "q libvol"...
I assume you know about the MAXSCRATCH parameter on the storage pool...
Are you checking in volumes as private, or as scratch?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
> Wolfgang Herkenrath
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:32 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Scratching empty tapes
>
>
> Hi *SM'ers,
>
> TSM 3.7.0.0 on AIX
>
> I'm testing TSM 3.7 on AIX. Until now TSM run's on MVS.
> I have defined one sequential Storagepool, which is connected
> with a 3494 ATL.
> The maximum Scratch Volumes are set to 45.
> There is one client defined.
>
> Every day I checked the number of volumes in the Storage Pool and
> wonder why so much volumes are needed.
> I checked it and wonder. At the Storage Pool are 49 volumes. 37
> of these volumes have the status 'empty'.
>
> Count TSM only the volumes wich are 'full' or 'filling' when it
> checks the 'maximum scratch volumes'? I think normaly it must say
> 'hey dude, storage pool is full'.
>
> If the storage pool needs a volume, take it first the 'empty'
> volumes or scratch tapes?
>
> If I define a second storage pool, is it able to get a 'empty'
> volume from the other pool?
>
> Is it possible to change the status of the 'empty' volumes from
> private to scratch with automation or must I do it manually?
>
> At Administrator's Guide I can't found a answer.
>
> TIA
>
> Wolfgang
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>