ADSM-L

Re: What, if anything, is wrong with this scenario....

2001-06-01 13:29:16
Subject: Re: What, if anything, is wrong with this scenario....
From: Bill Colwell <bcolwell AT DRAPER DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 13:21:03 -0400
I don't think it will work, but it is close.

Don't edit the disklog, instead do a '/format' step.

If you are using grs in your sysplex (I don't know how you could
run a sysplex and not use grs),  when you start the new instance it will
try to allocate the disk pool volumes but will fail because the production 
server
has them allocate 'disp=old'.

I will send you sample jcl directly.


--
--------------------------
--------------------------
Bill Colwell
Bill Colwell
C. S. Draper Lab
Cambridge, Ma.
bcolwell AT draper DOT com
--------------------------
In <OFB5E2E575.D6C43D11-ON85256A5E.0044623E AT vcu DOT edu>, on 06/01/01
In <OFB5E2E575.D6C43D11-ON85256A5E.0044623E AT vcu DOT edu>, on 06/01/01
   at 01:21 PM, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU> said:

>I need to move our OS/390 ADSM to TSM 4.1 (especially since we called IBM
>support for help with a client problem and they pretty much told us to come
>back when we are running on a supported release of TSM, and not before
>!!!).

>I have tested running an UPGRADEDB on a small test ADSM. As before, it only
>took a few seconds (never has taken very long ????).

>Now I need to run it on my production, 14GB DB.

>Management wants to know how long it will take. Since I can't answer that,
>they want me to test it by replicating my ADSM DB in a test environment and
>then doing the UPGRADEDB against the copy of the production DB.

>This is what I am attempting to do. Can someone tell me if this will/won't
>work, why, and how to get around the issues, if possible ?

>The objective is to take the current TEST ADSM and rebuild it's
>configuration to use a copy of the production DB and then run a UPGRADEDB
>on it.
>Note, the TEST ADSM is running on a TEST LPAR.

>I have created and formatted 7-new DB volume/data sets.
>I have performed a BACKUP DEVCONFIG and edited the TEST OPTIONS file to
>include a DEVCONFIG statement pointing to this file.
>I have update the DISKLOG file to include the names of the 7-new DB
>volumes/data sets (and removed the TEST DB it was using !).
>** I am going to perform a RESTORE DB pointing to the TEST DISKLOG and
>OPTIONS and point to a current backup of the production DB, using the
>following JCL snippet:
>//RESTORDB  EXEC PGM=DSMSERV,DYNAMNBR=300,
>//          PARM='/RESTORE DB DEV=DBBACKUP VOL=FILE:DD:TAPES'

>Anything wrong with this approach ?

>My biggest concern is that it will attempt to access the production ADSM
>files (this is a sysplex) and hurt them !

>===========================
>Zoltan Forray
>Virginia Commonwealth University
>University Computing Center
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>