Re: Server-to-server COPYPOOL, anyone?
None of the two (2) replies that I got made it to the list ...
thanks anyway to the contributors.
From that little traffic, do I assume correctly that
server-to-server copypools are rarely being used?
Still, I'd be grateful for further *sizing* and configuration hints.
On 26-OCT-2000 09:54, I had written:
> It has been proposed that we "mirror" rather large
> (>1 TB) Storagepools on another server.
> Is anyone doing this? I'd like to know about experiences,
> in particular with respect to media consumption on the
> secondary site, and ideas how to choose the MAXCAPACITY
> of virtual volumes (in relation to tape capacity).
> (I'm currently reading the digest, so please CC:
> inquiries to me directly, for faster turn-around).
Wolfgang J. Moeller, Tel. +49 551 201-1516/-1510, moeller AT gwdvms.dnet.gwdg
GWDG, D-37077 Goettingen, F.R.Germany | Disclaimer: No claim intended!
http://www.gwdg.de/~moeller/ ---- <moeller AT gwdg DOT de> ---- <w.moeller AT
ieee DOT org>