|
Re: Experiances with Magstar 3575 and the new XL tapes
1999-12-03 03:28:12
|
Subject: |
Re: Experiances with Magstar 3575 and the new XL tapes |
|
From: |
"Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT NL> |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 Dec 1999 09:28:12 +0100 |
Hi Kelly!
No, I haven't set the Estimated Capacity parameter in the device class.
The estimated capacity for the complete copypool is 5143969.8 Mb. I'm using
318 tapes, so that's an estimated capacity of 16176 Mb. per tape. That's
O.K.! But when I issue a q volume I see a lot of tapes with an estimated
capacity of 5000 Mb. The XL tapes have a native capacity of 7000 Mb. so this
is not correct.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Experiances with Magstar 3575 and the new XL tapes, Sharp, Chris
- Re: Experiances with Magstar 3575 and the new XL tapes, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
- Re: Experiances with Magstar 3575 and the new XL tapes, Angela Hopkins
- Re: Experiances with Magstar 3575 and the new XL tapes, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
- Re: Experiances with Magstar 3575 and the new XL tapes, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: Experiances with Magstar 3575 and the new XL tapes,
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM <=
- Re: Experiances with Magstar 3575 and the new XL tapes, Angela Hopkins [mailto:HOPKIA
- Re: Experiances with Magstar 3575 and the new XL tapes, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
- Re: Experiances with Magstar 3575 and the new XL tapes, Kelly J . Lipp [mailto:lipp
|
|
|
