Re: ADSM Bottleneck
2015-10-04 17:40:32
NT is your bottleneck !
Sorry for the strong way of saying, but scalability is not the strong point
for NT, so adding processors is not closer to linear (ideal) performance
growth.
I am not sure, but NT licensing for SMP systems and the NT system itself
may not be worth the performance gain.
If I were you I would add memory and try to distribute I/O through many
disk/tapes controllers. Probably results will be a lot better than just
adding another CPU.
good luck,
Rodrigo
>We are about to spec out a new ADSM server running NT on the Intel platfor
>We are interested in opinions of what are the main bottlenecks for ADSM
>performance. For instance, would adding multiple processors increase
>performance (especially ADSM DB) or is memory more important. Thanks in
>advance.
>Seth Forgosh
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, (continued)
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Remeta, Mark
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Mauro M. TINELLI
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Richard Sims
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Menno Koehler
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Don Caronna
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Rodrigo Cordovil Gazzaneo
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Michael Lightfoot
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Joshua Bassi
- ADSM Bottleneck, Forgosh , Seth [mailto:sforgosh
- ADSM Bottleneck, Forgosh , Seth [mailto:sforgosh
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck,
Rodrigo Cordovil Gazzaneo [mailto:rgazzaneo <=
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Joshua Bassi [mailto:jbassi
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Rodrigo Cordovil Gazzaneo [mailto:rgazzaneo
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
|
|
|