ADSM-L

Re: dsmc.exe does dr. watson

1999-06-10 10:28:04
Subject: Re: dsmc.exe does dr. watson
From: "Helms, William H." <william_h_helms AT MD.NORTHGRUM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:28:04 -0400
Nathan............Yes, we have opened a problem with IBM on this - they have
multiple dumps, code, adsm files, and problem reports from us regarding this
situation.  Most of these problems occur when using the command line
interface.  If you execute the same commands via the GUI, many of the
problems with Dr. Watsons, hanging sessions, and aborted sessions are
circumvented.  We have also submitted for a 'Requirements Request'
concerning this...........Bill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan King [SMTP:nathan.king AT USAA DOT COM]
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 9:54 AM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      Re: dsmc.exe does dr. watson
> 
> I've seen lots of posts about these Dr.Watsons on NT4 / SP4 with 3.1.0.6.
> I haven't come across these myself (and I have over 500 NT servers at Sp4
> with the 3.1.0.6 Client) but I would like to know if anyone has opened a
> problem with IBM about this. This is clearly affecting a lot of people.
> 
> Nathan
> 
> 
> 
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From:   Cargill, Bill [SMTP:BHCargill AT SNOPUD DOT COM]
>         Sent:   Thursday, June 10, 1999 8:43 AM
>         To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>         Subject:        Re: dsmc.exe does dr. watson
> 
>            I have about 30 NT servers running NT4/SP4, with no problems.
> Don't have
>         any running SP5 as of yet.
> 
>            Bill Cargill
>         Sr. Technical Support Specialist
>         AIX Systems Administration
>         425-347-4466
>         bhcargill AT snopud DOT com
>         Pager - 425-335-9496
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         > -----Original Message-----
>         > From: McNamara, Linda [SMTP:LMCNAMA AT CITGO DOT COM]
>         > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 6:32 AM
>         > To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>         > Subject:      Re: dsmc.exe does dr. watson
>         > 
>         > I am also having a problem with Dr. Watson and assertion error. 
> My setup
>         > is slightly different.  
>         > New PC - Windows NT 4 Service Pack 5 
>         >         (1) Initially installed ADSM client 3.1.0.6.  Was having
> problems
>         > with language in opt file.  Removed and re-           installed,
> same
>         > problem.  It was not seeing the lang in the opt file.
>         > 
>         >         (2) Upgraded to ADSM client 3.1.0.7.  Now I am receiving
> Dr.
>         > Watsons. 
>         > 
>         > Server is AIX ver 3.1.1.5. 
>         > 
>         > Both client work fine on NT4 SP3.  Is there a problem with
> running
> under
>         > SP4 or SP5? 
>         > 
>         > If anyone has any suggestions or can point me in the right
> direction,  I
>         > would greatly appreciate it.  
>         > 
>         > 
>         > 
>         >       ---------- 
>         > From:   Lauer Edouard[SMTP:Edouard.Lauer AT BIL-DEXIA DOT COM] 
>         > Reply To:       ADSM: Dist Stor Manager 
>         > Sent:   Thursday, June 10, 1999 3:52 AM 
>         > To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU 
>         > Subject:        dsmc.exe does dr. watson 
>         > 
>         >       Hello, 
>         > 
>         >       The adsm client 3.1.0.6 hangs sometimes on several Windows
> Nt4 SP4 
>         > operating systems with an 'exception violation'. Does someone
> know
> of 
>         > the same problem and how to handle it? 
>         > 
>         >       Regards, 
>         > _________________ Lauer Edouard ____________________ 
>         > ______ Prod. informatique ____ Systèmes Ouverts ________ 
>         > __ * +352 4590 3889 __ * Edouard.Lauer AT bil-dexia DOT com __ 
>         > 
>         > 
>         >
> ============================================================= 
>         > An electronic message is not binding on its sender. 
>         > Any message referring to a binding engagement must be confirmed
> in
> writing
>         > and duly signed. 
>         > 
>         >
> ============================================================= 
>         > 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>