ADSM-L

Re: dsmc.exe does dr. watson

1999-06-10 09:43:07
Subject: Re: dsmc.exe does dr. watson
From: "Cargill, Bill" <BHCargill AT SNOPUD DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 06:43:07 -0700
   I have about 30 NT servers running NT4/SP4, with no problems. Don't have
any running SP5 as of yet.

   Bill Cargill
Sr. Technical Support Specialist
AIX Systems Administration
425-347-4466
bhcargill AT snopud DOT com
Pager - 425-335-9496




> -----Original Message-----
> From: McNamara, Linda [SMTP:LMCNAMA AT CITGO DOT COM]
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 6:32 AM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      Re: dsmc.exe does dr. watson
> 
> I am also having a problem with Dr. Watson and assertion error.  My setup
> is slightly different.  
> New PC - Windows NT 4 Service Pack 5 
>         (1) Initially installed ADSM client 3.1.0.6.  Was having problems
> with language in opt file.  Removed and re-           installed, same
> problem.  It was not seeing the lang in the opt file.
> 
>         (2) Upgraded to ADSM client 3.1.0.7.  Now I am receiving Dr.
> Watsons. 
> 
> Server is AIX ver 3.1.1.5. 
> 
> Both client work fine on NT4 SP3.  Is there a problem with running under
> SP4 or SP5? 
> 
> If anyone has any suggestions or can point me in the right direction,  I
> would greatly appreciate it.  
> 
> 
> 
>       ---------- 
> From:   Lauer Edouard[SMTP:Edouard.Lauer AT BIL-DEXIA DOT COM] 
> Reply To:       ADSM: Dist Stor Manager 
> Sent:   Thursday, June 10, 1999 3:52 AM 
> To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU 
> Subject:        dsmc.exe does dr. watson 
> 
>       Hello, 
> 
>       The adsm client 3.1.0.6 hangs sometimes on several Windows Nt4 SP4 
> operating systems with an 'exception violation'. Does someone know of 
> the same problem and how to handle it? 
> 
>       Regards, 
> _________________ Lauer Edouard ____________________ 
> ______ Prod. informatique ____ Systèmes Ouverts ________ 
> __ * +352 4590 3889 __ * Edouard.Lauer AT bil-dexia DOT com __ 
> 
> 
>       ============================================================= 
> An electronic message is not binding on its sender. 
> Any message referring to a binding engagement must be confirmed in writing
> and duly signed. 
> 
>       ============================================================= 
> 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>