Re: SQL Server 6.5 and ADSM
1999-04-23 16:19:53
Subject: |
Re: SQL Server 6.5 and ADSM |
From: |
Steve Cartacki <cartacs AT PJM DOT COM> |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Apr 1999 16:19:53 -0400 |
How big is the database 'tempdb' ?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Vicini [SMTP:vicini AT SOLUTIONTECHNOLOGY DOT COM]
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 1999 3:51 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: SQL Server 6.5 and ADSM
>
> Can someone please help me. We have a rather large ADSM environment. We
> would like to use the ADSM Connect agent for Microsoft SQL Server 6.5. Our
> DBA
> has been opposed to this idea, because he believes that the "ADSM client code
> corrupts his databases".
>
> For his benefit, performed the following test:
>
> 1. Installed NT and SQL Server with NT SP4 and SQL SP5.
> 2. The DBA moved the data from another SQL Server to the test machine using
> "Object transfer" and "Transactions". The DBA then updated one of the
> fields
> on one table of the database. When he did this, he received a transaction log
> error similar to the following:
>
> " Can't allocate space for object syslogs in database dbname because the
> logsegment is full. If you ran out of space in syslogs, dump the
> transaction
> log. Otherwise use ALTER DATABASE or sp_extendsegment to increase the
> size
> of
> the segment."
>
> 3. The ADSM NT and Connect Agent clients are loaded on the machine and the
> machine is re-booted
>
> 4. We started SQL Enterprise Manager and noticed that the database in
> question
> had gone into "Recovery Mode".
>
> 5. The DBA checked the sizes for the database again using "Edit Database" and
> the total size information looks correct however, the available space on the
> transaction log and the available space on the database show 0 bytes
> available.
>
> 8. The DBA tried expanding the database and truncating the transaction log at
> this point and still received the same 0 bytes available.
>
> 9. The DBA claims that the database is corrupted due to fact that the
> incorrect
> size is being reported for the database and transaction log and he claims he
> only receives this result when ADSM is loaded on the machine.
>
> I can't see how loading ADSM code on a machine could have this type of
> effect.
> Can someone tell me what the above error message might really mean ?
|
|
|