Re: serious volume problem
1999-04-09 10:42:18
Subject: |
Re: serious volume problem |
From: |
Henk ten Have <hthta AT SARA DOT NL> |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Apr 1999 16:42:18 +0200 |
On 09-Apr-99 Richard Sims wrote:
>> 1) If a volume with valid data is deleted from the primary storage pool,
>> how can I get this data back from the copy storage pool?
>
> Deletion of files from the primary storage pool means instant expiration
> for their images in the copy storage pool - gonzo.
Ok, good point. But how can I be sure that those (valid) files did
really expire their images in the copy storage pool? And that they
really disappear from the primary pool?
I mean, how can I check that? Yes, maybe I'm suspicious, but I
do not always believe what ADSM likes me to believe :-(
>> 2) Is there a consistency check between a primary storage pool and his
>> copy storage pool?
>
> Just Backup Stgpool.
Hm, that's not what I mean: how can I be sure that all data on the
copy pool is also on the primary pool? (Well, I suppose Backup Stgpool
will expire data which is found on the copy pool and which is not found
on the primary pool)
Cheers,
Henk ten Have.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: serious volume problem, Henk ten Have
- Re: serious volume problem, Henk ten Have
- Re: serious volume problem, Leo Humar
- Re: serious volume problem, Henk ten Have
- Re: serious volume problem, Richard Sims
- Re: serious volume problem, P. Michael Fahey
- Re: serious volume problem,
Henk ten Have <=
- Re: serious volume problem, Richard Sims
- Re: serious volume problem, Prather, Wanda
- Re: serious volume problem, Dwight Cook
|
|
|