Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??
1998-11-12 09:45:18
At 05:00 PM 11/11/98 -0700, Larry Chisesi wrote:
> Duty cycles on DLT are based on 10-20%
>utilization, but ADSM can require much more out of a tape drive.
The literature I have seen on DLT indicated that their numbers were based
on 100% duty cycles. If you have evidence to the contrary, I would be very
interested in seeing it.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, (continued)
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Jeff Connor
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Ben Kokenge
- FW: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Dan Ticknor
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Paul Zarnowski
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Larry Chisesi
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Steven P Roder
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Richard Sims
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??,
Paul Zarnowski <=
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Gary Grider
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Larry Chisesi
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Mark Dyer [SMTP:mark.dyer
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Paul Zarnowski [SMTP:vkm
- Re: Should I buy Magstar or DLT ..??, Paul Zarnowski [mailto:vkm
|
|
|