I agree too.

Prather, Wanda wrote:

> Here's a YES vote - I think it is worthwhile...
>         ----------
>         From:   David G. Kalenderian[SMTP:DAVEK AT mitvma.mit DOT edu]
>         Sent:   Wednesday, December 03, 1997 7:54 AM
>         To:     ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu
>         Subject:        Re: ADSM requirements
>
>         On Wed, 3 Dec 1997 06:38:05 -0500 Sanders, David said:
>         >Jerry, this sounds like a good idea.  Knowledge = leverage!
>         >
>         >> -----Original Message-----
>         >> From: Jerry Lawson [SMTP:jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM]
>         >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 1997 7:31 PM
>         >> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>         >> Subject:      Re: ADSM requirements
>         >>
>         >> ---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes
>         >> ---------------------------
>         >> From: INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE
>         >> Date: 12/1/97 5:14PM
>         >> To: Jerry Lawson at ASUPO
>         >> *To: *ADSM-L at SNADGATE
>         >> Subject: Re: ADSM requirements
>         >>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>         >> ---------
>         >> Hey gang -
>         >>
>         >> Those who have been around the list for a while remember my
> gripe with
>         >> requirements and submission of them - I won't repeat them
> here.
>         >>
>         >> But I did have an idea..... What if there was some way to
> track what
>         >> requests
>         >> had been submitted to IBM?  Dave Kalendarian has provided the
> number
>         >> of the
>         >> V3 for VM requirement.... What if we posted the information
> about a
>         >> request
>         >> to the list when we submitted one, so others would have a
> chance to
>         >> say "Me
>         >> too!"!  Or perhaps someone who can develop Internet web pages
> (I'm
>         >> limited to
>         >> Intranet) could build a page of the ones that had been
> supplied by
>         >> other list
>         >> members.....
>         >>
>         >> I keep thinking there has to be a better way here..... What
> do others
>         >> think?
>         >>
>         >> Jerry Lawson
>         >> jlawson AT thehartford DOT com
>
>         Jerry,
>
>         I think it's a good idea. We shouldn't limit ourselves to this
> one requirement.
>         If others think it is worth while, I could create the Web page
> for ADSM
>         requirements.
>
>         Dave Kalenderian
>         M.I.T.



--
Pier Antonio BIANCHI
Pier Antonio BIANCHI
ADSM, System Manager
JRC - Ispra
Italy