>> We do hope to fix this "performance" issue in the next release.  We intend
>> to have the trees be dynamic, so that the entire tree does not need to be
>> loaded.
>
>My question - are there plans to do the same thing is OS/2?  I would find an
>"exploding" tree structure for OS/2 to be a big help.  for example - with OS/2
>Warp and NetWare - we get a directory entry for EVERY server in our network (a
>big number), and then we get this list again in the backup desktop.  Now we
>could debate the intelligence of that with OS/2 developers, but the effect is
>a huge map when I do a trree structure of my C drive backup.  Sure would be
>nicer (and help performance) if this was all hidden by one (big?) "+"
>

Jerry,

This functionality would be available in all the GUIs ;-)

Brett

o----------------------------------------------------------o
Brett Walker                  ADSM Development, IBM
walkerbl AT vnet.ibm DOT com
--------------------------------------------------------
"That's just my opinion; I could be wrong."
"That's just my opinion; I could be wrong."
      --- Dennis Miller