[no subject]
1995-08-15 21:11:07
Subject: GUI backup speed (AT&T client)
> Vince says:
>
> One of my users says it takes about four times longer using the
> X-Windows AT&T GUI client vs. the command line client. Does this
> make any sense to anyone? I would expect maybe 1.2 times but not fou
> I have run several tests backup/restore, archive/retrieve with small
> and large files on an AT&T client. There was no big difference in the
> performance between CLC and GUI. In some cases the GUI took 1.5 times
> more time (but not four times). What is the customers environment?
> Michael Lindner, IBM Germany
Anyway, we still have this problem- and it seems worse. So bad that
I reported as a problem to IBM ADSM support. Here's the breakdown
of the accounting record from a couple very similar backups. It's
hard to accept a nearly 850% increase.
Command Line GUI
------------------------- -------------------------
Server DSMSERV Server DSMSERV
Client CAOSSCM4 Client CAOSSCM4
Type ATT Type ATT
Comm. method Tcp/Ip Comm. method Tcp/Ip
Date 07/27/1995 Date 07/26/1995
Time 11:22:36 Time 17:52:02
Session Len 1483 Session Len 12487
Archives in 5158 Archives in 5157
Backups in 0 Backups in 0
Archive data 17329 Archive data 17306
Backup data 0 Backup data 0
Archives out 0 Archives out 0
Backups out 0 Backups out 0
Retrieve data 0 Retrieve data 0
Restore data 0 Restore data 0
Idle Wait 226 Idle Wait 4433
Comm. Wait 1026 Comm. Wait 6060
Media Wait 0 Media Wait 0
CPU Time 57 CPU Time 60
Auth Method 1 Auth Method 1
Termination 1 Termination 0
Total data 17996 Total data 18036
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Vince Allio (510)675-5614 USBOACVB AT IBMMAIL DOT COM Bank of America
Vince Allio (510)675-5614 USBOACVB AT IBMMAIL DOT COM Bank of America
--------------------------------------------------------------------
=========================================================================
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [no subject],
Vince Allio <=
|
|
|