Hi,
My TSM DB size is 8TB and support has advice to run offline DB reorg which help us to save Total estimated 1827 GB. Could you please share your experience , what would be the implication? is there any chance to corrupt the TSM DB? Time taken to complete the reorg? etc
For your reference here is the summary
If SD_CHUNK_LOCATIONS were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 22 GB, Index 535 GB
If BACKUP_OBJECTS were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 26 GB, Index 28 GB
If SD_RECON_ORDER were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 22 GB, Index 356 GB
If GROUP_LEADERS were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 14 GB, Index 0 GB
If SD_REPLICATED_CHUNKS were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 6 GB, Index 204 GB
If BF_AGGREGATED_BITFILES were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 35 GB, Index 225 GB
If SD_NON_DEDUP_LOCATIONS were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 2 GB, Index 29 GB
If ACTIVITY_LOG were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 8 GB, Index 0 GB
If BF_DEREFERENCED_CHUNKS were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 0 GB, Index 2 GB
If BF_BITFILE_EXTENTS were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 55 GB, Index 129 GB
If AS_SEGMENTS were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 0 GB, Index 1 GB
If SD_REFCOUNT_UPDATES were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 9 GB, Index 114 GB
If AF_BITFILES were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 0 GB, Index 1 GB
If TSMMON_STATUS were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 3 GB, Index 0 GB
If AF_SEGMENTS were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 0 GB, Index 1 GB
If ACTIVITY_SUMMARY were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 0 GB, Index 0 GB
If BF_AGGREGATE_ATTRIBUTES were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 0 GB, Index 0 GB
If ARCHIVE_OBJECTS were to be off line reorganized the estimated savings is Table 0 GB, Index 0 GB
Total estimated savings 1827 GB