This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 006B12E5862570D8_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 12/15/2005 12:03:37 PM:

> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 10:25:24AM -0600, Karl.Rossing AT Federated DOT CA 
wrote:
> > I might have to upgrade NB to 6.0GA for various reasons on my 
production 
> > box. I realize that it's not recommended  to upgrade until mp1 but i'm 

> > kinda stuck.
> 
> I think that MP1 is due out this week.  However, in our discussions with
> Symantec, MP2 looks like it might be the upgrade point for us.

I opened a service call on "When will MP1 be availible".

As of this morning's update, it's December 22nd. They will not give me 
information on what the bug fixes are in MP1.

Karl
--=_alternative 006B12E5862570D8_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=2><tt>veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 
12/15/2005
12:03:37 PM:<br>
<br>
&gt; On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 10:25:24AM -0600, Karl.Rossing AT Federated DOT CA
wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; I might have to upgrade NB to 6.0GA for various reasons on my
production <br>
&gt; &gt; box. I realize that it's not recommended &nbsp;to upgrade until
mp1 but i'm <br>
&gt; &gt; kinda stuck.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; I think that MP1 is due out this week. &nbsp;However, in our discussions
with<br>
&gt; Symantec, MP2 looks like it might be the upgrade point for us.<br>
</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>I opened a service call on &quot;When will MP1 be
availible&quot;.</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>As of this morning's update, it's December 22nd. They
will not give me information on what the bug fixes are in MP1.</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>Karl</tt></font>
--=_alternative 006B12E5862570D8_=--