[Veritas-bu] Veritas NBU 5.1 Encryption
2005-07-08 08:46:37
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] Veritas NBU 5.1 Encryption |
From: |
len.boyle AT sas DOT com (len boyle) |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jul 2005 08:46:37 -0400 |
Scott
We are using it for one of our backup systems.
But as it was a given that we were going to use it, there are no performance
tests pre-and post encryption.
One issue we are looking at is the length of the key, length of the
passphase, and how often we should change them. Since the data is to be
stored for a long period of time, we are thinking that we have to use a long
key with a long passphase. Anyone else have thoughts on this.
Thanks len
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Roemmele" <scottroemmele AT quickenloans DOT com>
To: <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas NBU 5.1 Encryption
> Is anyone actually using the Veritas Encryption Option?
>
> Scott
>
>
> On 7/7/05 7:32 AM, "Scott Roemmele" <scottroemmele AT quickenloans DOT com>
> wrote:
>
>> NBU'ers
>>
>> What is the general opinion surrounding Veritas' Encryption option?
>> What performance impact do clients take and how much longer do backups
>> take?
>> Is there considerable added CPU load on the media/master servers?
>> Are there better alternatives?
>> Is it wise to use there encryption in a PKI infrastructure?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Scott Roemmele
>> Centralized Storage and Data Life Cycle Team
>> Quicken Loans, Inc.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
|
|
|