Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] status code 50

2004-01-27 12:19:14
Subject: [Veritas-bu] status code 50
From: John.Nardello AT T-Mobile DOT com (Nardello, John)
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:19:14 -0800
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C3E4F9.AFA435F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

Don't know if it will help you, but we've seen status 50s before when one of
our scripted backups passed a bad file list to NetBackup. That job stayed
queued for about 10 minutes, then it and most of the other backups currently
running get status 50s (or a few others depending on where they were in the
process. i.e. 71s, etc). If you're scripting any of your backups to create
file lists, you might want to check them out, maybe start looking for a
common denominator between your failures - is there a job or two common
between all of them ? Or is the same script being used ? 
 
Something to think about anyway. NB 4.5 FP4 on HP for our master. 

John Nardello 
T-Mobile: Enterprise Backup Group 


-----Original Message-----
From: Griese, Paul [mailto:Paul.Griese AT telecheck DOT com]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 12:19 PM
To: 'MacKinnon, G. R. (Gregory)'; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] status code 50



Doing the sychnronize global device DB on the media servers did not stop the
status 50 aborts. 

Pauk 

-----Original Message----- 
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [
mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
<mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu> ] On Behalf Of 
MacKinnon,
G. R. (Gregory)

Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 12:00 PM 
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] status code 50 


Griese, Paul wrote: 

>  
> NBU 4.5 MP3 on Solaris Master, Solaris 8, Ultra-4, running about 370 
> active policies; catalog DB is about 64 GB and hasn't been compressed 
> lately. We have many Solaris, NT and VMS clients. A bunch of the 
> clients are on a SAN. We save about 4.5 to 5.2 TB a day and we use 4 
> L700 robots. 
>  
> Everything was running great. We went 34 days with uninterrupted 
> Netbackup service at the end of the year - a record for us - we did 
> not have to do any Netbackup bounces. Now everything has gone to heck. 
> We can't go two days without many jobs dying with status code 50, 
> always in the early morning hours, and it usually happens 
> every morning. Rarely do we have a day free of these status 50 aborted 
> jobs. After a few days of this, things deteriorate to the point where 
> jobs just hang, can not be killed, and we wind-up having to bounce 
> Netbackup.  We have tried rescheduling jobs so that there are not so 
> many running between midnight and 6AM, but it doesn't seem to help. We 
> are actually more busy after 6AM but we don't get this rash of code 
> 50s after 6AM. We have added a few more active policies in the past 
> month, but we have also purged some data off of some other clients 
> which has made their backup jobs run for a shorter period of time.  
>  
> Veritas has been little help. They have told us three different 
> things: 1). Try running two Masters; 2). move your Master to a more 
> powerful SUN box; 3). install MP5. They seem to imply that we have 
> overloaded our SUN box Master, but the uptime and top commands don't 
> show excessive load on CPU or memory. 
>  
> We are going to try installing MP5. The release notes mention error 
> code 50, but it relates to "queued vault job receives a status 50" 
> which is not exactly our problem. We run Vault in the afternoon 
> and they do not have the status 50 problem. The problem resides with 
> our nornal backups, not Vault. 
>  
> So, has anybody had an experience like this? Did MP5 help? Is an 
> Ultra-4 not powerful enough for our environment? 
>  
>  
> Paul Griese 
> System Management 
> 713-331-6454 
>  
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> _______ 
> 
> 
> (c) 2003 TeleCheck International, Inc. THIS DOCUMENT, AND ANY ATTACHED 
> INFORMATION: 1) IS PROPRIETARY, PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY 
> OF TELECHECK UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, AND 2) IS INTENDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR 
> INTERNAL USE BY TELECHECK EMPLOYEES AND INTENDED RECIPIENTS WITH A 
> LEGITIMATE TELECHECK BUSINESS NEED THEREFORE. ITS REPRODUCTION, 
> DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION AND/OR DISCLOSURE, EXCEPT TO SUCH 
> TELECHECK EMPLOYEES AND INTENDED RECIPIENTS, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED . 
> IF YOU ARE NOT SUCH A TELECHECK EMPLOYEE OR INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE 
> EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THIS MESSAGE TO THE 
> INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY REPRODUCTION, 
> DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION AND/OR DISCLOSURE OF THIS DOCUMENT, OR ANY 
> ATTACHMENTS, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. 
> 
Are you using SSO with more than 1 media server having access to the tape
drives? If so you might have to do a Synchronize Global Device Database on
the media servers. Don't know why it happens, but that seems to fix our '50'
problem.

Gregg 


-- 
================================================================= 
Gregg MacKinnon                         Ford Motor Co. 
gmackinn AT ford DOT com                       2101 Village Rd. 
Technical Computing Section             Rm 1116, MD 1076        
(313) 594-3716   pager 7958343          Dearborn Michigan, 48124 
==================================================================



_______________________________________________ 
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu>  
____________________________________________________________________________
_ 

(c) 2003 TeleCheck International, Inc. THIS DOCUMENT, AND ANY ATTACHED
INFORMATION: 1) IS PROPRIETARY, PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF
TELECHECK UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, AND 2)  IS INTENDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR INTERNAL
USE BY TELECHECK EMPLOYEES AND INTENDED RECIPIENTS WITH A LEGITIMATE
TELECHECK BUSINESS NEED THEREFORE.  ITS REPRODUCTION, DISSEMINATION,
DISTRIBUTION AND/OR  DISCLOSURE, EXCEPT TO SUCH TELECHECK EMPLOYEES AND
INTENDED RECIPIENTS,  IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED .  IF YOU ARE NOT SUCH A
TELECHECK EMPLOYEE OR INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT
RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THIS MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE
HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY REPRODUCTION, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION AND/OR
DISCLOSURE OF THIS DOCUMENT, OR ANY ATTACHMENTS, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.




------_=_NextPart_001_01C3E4F9.AFA435F0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>RE: [Veritas-bu] status code 50</TITLE>

<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4934.1600" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=960281517-27012004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Don't 
know if it will help you, but we've seen status 50s before when one of our 
scripted backups passed a bad file list to NetBackup. That job stayed queued 
for 
about 10 minutes, then it and most of the other backups currently running get 
status 50s (or a few others depending on where they were in the process. i.e. 
71s, etc). If you're scripting any of your backups to create file lists, you 
might want to check them out, maybe start looking for a common denominator 
between your failures - is there a job or two common between all of them ? Or 
is 
the same script being used ? </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=960281517-27012004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>Something to think about anyway. NB 4.5 FP4 on HP for our master. 
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<P><FONT face=Arial color=#000080 size=2>John Nardello</FONT> <BR><FONT 
face=Arial color=#000080 size=2>T-Mobile: Enterprise Backup Group</FONT> 
<BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Griese, Paul 
  [mailto:Paul.Griese AT telecheck DOT com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, January 26, 
2004 
  12:19 PM<BR><B>To:</B> 'MacKinnon, G. R. (Gregory)'; 
  veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Veritas-bu] 
status 
  code 50<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
  <P><FONT size=2>Doing the sychnronize global device DB on the media servers 
  did not stop the status 50 aborts.</FONT> </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>Pauk</FONT> </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>From: 
  veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [<A 
  href="mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT 
edu">mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</A>] 
  On Behalf Of MacKinnon, G. R. (Gregory)</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=2>Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 12:00 PM</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT> <BR><FONT 
size=2>Subject: 
  Re: [Veritas-bu] status code 50</FONT> </P><BR>
  <P><FONT size=2>Griese, Paul wrote:</FONT> </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>&gt;&nbsp; </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; NBU 4.5 MP3 on 
Solaris 
  Master, Solaris 8, Ultra-4, running about 370</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; 
  active policies; catalog DB is about 64 GB and hasn't been compressed 
  </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; lately. We have many Solaris, NT and VMS 
clients. 
  A bunch of the </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; clients are on a SAN. We save 
  about 4.5 to 5.2 TB a day and we use 4 </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; L700 
  robots.</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt;&nbsp; </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; 
  Everything was running great. We went 34 days with uninterrupted</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; Netbackup service at the end of the year - a record for 
  us - we did </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; not have to do any Netbackup 
bounces. 
  Now everything has gone to heck. </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; We can't go two 
  days without many jobs dying with status code 50, </FONT><BR><FONT 
size=2>&gt; 
  always in the early morning hours, and it usually happens </FONT><BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt; every morning. Rarely do we have a day free of these status 50 
  aborted </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; jobs. After a few days of this, things 
  deteriorate to the point where </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; jobs just hang, 
  can not be killed, and we wind-up having to bounce </FONT><BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt; Netbackup.&nbsp; We have tried rescheduling jobs so that there 
are 
  not so </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; many running between midnight and 6AM, 
but 
  it doesn't seem to help. We </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; are actually more 
  busy after 6AM but we don't get this rash of code </FONT><BR><FONT 
size=2>&gt; 
  50s after 6AM. We have added a few more active policies in the past 
  </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; month, but we have also purged some data off of 
  some other clients </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; which has made their backup 
  jobs run for a shorter period of time.&nbsp; </FONT><BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt;&nbsp; </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; Veritas has been little help. 
  They have told us three different</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; things: 1). 
Try 
  running two Masters; 2). move your Master to a more </FONT><BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt; powerful SUN box; 3). install MP5. They seem to imply that we 
have 
  </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; overloaded our SUN box Master, but the uptime 
and 
  top commands don't </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; show excessive load on CPU or 
  memory.</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt;&nbsp; </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; We 
are 
  going to try installing MP5. The release notes mention error</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt; code 50, but it relates to "queued vault job receives a status 
50" 
  </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; which is not exactly our problem. We run Vault 
in 
  the afternoon </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; and they do not have the status 50 
  problem. The problem resides with </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; our nornal 
  backups, not Vault.</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt;&nbsp; </FONT><BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt; So, has anybody had an experience like this? Did MP5 help? Is 
  an</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; Ultra-4 not powerful enough for our 
  environment?</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt;&nbsp; </FONT><BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt;&nbsp; </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; Paul Griese</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt; System Management</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; 
713-331-6454</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>&gt;&nbsp; </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt; 
  ______________________________________________________________________</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; _______</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; (c) 2003 TeleCheck International, 
  Inc. THIS DOCUMENT, AND ANY ATTACHED</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt; 
INFORMATION: 
  1) IS PROPRIETARY, PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY </FONT><BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt; OF TELECHECK UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, AND 2) IS INTENDED EXCLUSIVELY 
  FOR </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; INTERNAL USE BY TELECHECK EMPLOYEES AND 
  INTENDED RECIPIENTS WITH A </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; LEGITIMATE TELECHECK 
  BUSINESS NEED THEREFORE. ITS REPRODUCTION, </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; 
  DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION AND/OR DISCLOSURE, EXCEPT TO SUCH 
</FONT><BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt; TELECHECK EMPLOYEES AND INTENDED RECIPIENTS, IS STRICTLY 
  PROHIBITED . </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; IF YOU ARE NOT SUCH A TELECHECK 
  EMPLOYEE OR INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; EMPLOYEE 
  OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THIS MESSAGE TO THE </FONT><BR><FONT 
  size=2>&gt; INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY 
REPRODUCTION, 
  </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION AND/OR DISCLOSURE OF 
  THIS DOCUMENT, OR ANY </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>&gt; ATTACHMENTS, IS STRICTLY 
  PROHIBITED.</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>&gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Are you 
using 
  SSO with more than 1 media server having access to the tape drives? If so you 
  might have to do a Synchronize Global Device Database on the media servers. 
  Don't know why it happens, but that seems to fix our '50' problem.</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=2>Gregg</FONT> </P><BR>
  <P><FONT size=2>-- </FONT><BR><FONT 
  
size=2>=================================================================</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>Gregg MacKinnon &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ford Motor Co.</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>gmackinn AT ford DOT com&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2101 Village Rd. </FONT><BR><FONT 
  size=2>Technical Computing Section&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Rm 1116, MD 
  1076&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT><BR><FONT size=2>(313) 
  594-3716&nbsp;&nbsp; pager 7958343&nbsp; 
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Dearborn Michigan, 48124</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT 
  
size=2>==================================================================&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT></P><BR>
  <P><FONT size=2>_______________________________________________</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>Veritas-bu maillist&nbsp; -&nbsp; 
  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu <A target=_blank 
  
href="http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu";>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu</A></FONT>
 
  <BR><FONT 
  
size=2>_____________________________________________________________________________</FONT>
 
  </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>(c) 2003 TeleCheck International, Inc. THIS DOCUMENT, AND ANY 
  ATTACHED INFORMATION: 1) IS PROPRIETARY, PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY 
  OF TELECHECK UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, AND 2)&nbsp; IS INTENDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR 
  INTERNAL USE BY TELECHECK EMPLOYEES AND INTENDED RECIPIENTS WITH A LEGITIMATE 
  TELECHECK BUSINESS NEED THEREFORE.&nbsp; ITS REPRODUCTION, DISSEMINATION, 
  DISTRIBUTION AND/OR&nbsp; DISCLOSURE, EXCEPT TO SUCH TELECHECK EMPLOYEES AND 
  INTENDED RECIPIENTS,&nbsp; IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED .&nbsp; IF YOU ARE NOT SUCH 
  A TELECHECK EMPLOYEE OR INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT 
  RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THIS MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE 
  HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY REPRODUCTION, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION AND/OR 
  DISCLOSURE OF THIS DOCUMENT, OR ANY ATTACHMENTS, IS STRICTLY 
  PROHIBITED.</FONT></P><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C3E4F9.AFA435F0--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>