This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to
consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to
properly handle MIME multipart messages.
--=_D882C1D6.4322E152
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Some ideas . .=20
1. Could be network, ie. different router interfaces, multiple nics, =
full/half duplex setting on your nic cards or network hub/switches.
2. Virus scanners set to "in-bound" scanning will also create the =
performance problems your describing.
3. If your network is complicated you may want to try using the "required_i=
nterface" in the BP.INI file.
Scott J.
>>> "Leo Kliger" <leo_kliger AT digitalstorage.com DOT au> 06/13/01 09:59PM >>>
Hello All,
I have scoured the Archive Pages to no avail on this one.
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
The problem is that when I restore from Client A's backup
to Client B's storage on Netware 4 or 5 the restore crawls=20
along at about 1gig/hr. When I restore from Client A's backup
back to Client A's storage the restore flows through at a
healthy 9gig/hr.
Incidently Client B to Client B is also nice and quick.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Leo
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
--=_D882C1D6.4322E152
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" http-equiv=3DContent-Type=
>
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3612.1706"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"FONT: 8pt MS Sans Serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px; MARGIN-TOP: =
2px">
<DIV><FONT size=3D1></FONT>Some ideas . . </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>1. Could be network, ie. different router interfaces, multiple =
nics,=20
full/half duplex setting on your nic cards or network hub/switches.</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D1></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D1>2. Virus scanners set to "in-bound" scanning =
will=20
also create the performance problems your describing.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D1></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D1>3. If your network is complicated you may want to try =
using=20
the "required_interface" in the BP.INI file.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D1></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D1>Scott J.</FONT><BR><BR>>>> "Leo =
Kliger"=20
<leo_kliger AT digitalstorage.com DOT au> 06/13/01 09:59PM
>>><BR>H=
ello=20
All,<BR>I have scoured the Archive Pages to no avail on this one.<BR>Any=20=
feedback would be greatly appreciated.<BR><BR>The problem is that when I =
restore=20
from Client A's backup<BR>to Client B's storage on Netware 4 or 5 the =
restore=20
crawls <BR>along at about 1gig/hr. When I restore from Client A's =
backup<BR>back=20
to Client A's storage the restore flows through at a<BR>healthy=20
9gig/hr.<BR>Incidently Client B to Client B is also nice and quick.<BR><BR>=
Any=20
ideas?<BR>Regards,<BR>Leo<BR>______________________________________________=
_<BR>Veritas-bu=20
maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu";>http://m=
ailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu</A><BR></DIV></BODY></HTM=
L>
--=_D882C1D6.4322E152--
|
