Re: [Networker] DataDomain competitors
2010-09-02 20:34:17
We too have had great success with datadomain and vtl. They have been great
with after sale support and really very few problems other than the occasional
disk fail which is to be expected. Looking forward to additional feedback.
----- Original Message -----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
Sent: Thu Sep 02 15:42:32 2010
Subject: Re: [Networker] DataDomain competitors
On 09/02/10 09:19, Mats Atari wrote:
> Hello NetWorker list.
>
> I am keen on your advice regarding deduplication devices for NetWorker backup
> environments.
>
> I am all into doing with DataDomain, both VTL and NFS ways. However, not to
> blindfold myself to much - are there any competitors, which could compare
> with
> DataDomain today?
>
I don't know the market for dedup devices although I have worked with DD
lately and rather like them.
If you want cheap dedup options, there is lessfs on Linux and dedup
within ZFS. No idea how well these work.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|