FalconStor

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Geoffrey Kenny - Manager, Client
Services <geoffk AT hylouie DOT com> wrote:
> We too have had great success with datadomain and vtl.  They have been great 
> with after sale support and really very few problems other than the 
> occasional disk fail which is to be expected.  Looking forward to additional 
> feedback.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT 
> EDU>
> Sent: Thu Sep 02 15:42:32 2010
> Subject: Re: [Networker] DataDomain competitors
>
> On 09/02/10 09:19, Mats Atari wrote:
>> Hello NetWorker list.
>>
>> I am keen on your advice regarding deduplication devices for NetWorker backup
>> environments.
>>
>> I am all into doing with DataDomain, both VTL and NFS ways. However, not to
>> blindfold myself to much - are there any competitors, which could compare 
>> with
>> DataDomain today?
>>
>
> I don't know the market for dedup devices although I have worked with DD
> lately and rather like them.
>
> If you want cheap dedup options, there is lessfs on Linux and dedup
> within ZFS. No idea how well these work.
>
> To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
> type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
> networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with 
> this list. You can access the archives at 
> http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
> via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
>

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER